Whistleblower Blog Archives - Page 11 of 35

Whistleblower Blog

News in Government Procurement Fraud and False Claims

March 7, 2007
Michael Sullivan

We found a very interesting article from last week’s Legal Times, with an excerpt of interest to whistleblower lawyers as follows:

“Last fall, the Justice Department launched a National Procurement Fraud Task Force to focus “resources at all levels of government to increase criminal enforcement” in areas of procurement fraud. The stepped-up attention to this area throughout the government may signal that the $3.1 billion record in federal fraud recoveries in 2006 could soon be broken. More than 50 inspectors general from across all
(more…)

IRS Names New Head of IRS Criminal Investigative Division

February 27, 2007
Michael Sullivan

The IRS agents we have been meeting with since January to pursue whistleblower claims under the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program have a new boss, the IRS announced today.

The Criminal Investigative Division of the IRS will be led by Eileen Mayer, who was most recently head of the IRS’s Office of Fraud/Bank Secrecy Act.

We are encouraged by IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson’s comments that “she will play a key role in IRS efforts to halt tax fraud.” Agents of the Criminal Investigative Division work tax fraud cases, some of which are now originating under the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards program.

As a result of the IRS’s efforts, the Department of Justice has brought many successful prosecutions.
The IRS’s press release is reprinted below:
(more…)

New Medicaid False Claims Act Proposed in Georgia

February 26, 2007
Michael Sullivan

We were encouraged to see that Georgia has just joined the states that are considering a State “False Claims Act” with whistleblower provisions.

As we have discussed before on the Whistleblower Lawyer Blog, Congress has created great financial incentives for states that pass their own versions of the federal False Claims Act, with qui tam provisions that encourage whistleblowers. States can increase by 10% their share of Medicare fraud recoveries by passing their own False Claims Acts, but the state laws must pass muster with OIG and be at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act. Otherwise, as approximately seven other states were disappointed to find, the state does not receive an increase in its share of Medicare fraud recoveries.

Rep. Ed Lindsey is the sponsor of Georgia’s proposed “State False Medicaid Claims Act.” The new law would apply to Medicaid fraud and false claims, but not other fraud and false claims that cost the state taxpayers money.

The challenge will be to make sure that the new law is tough enough and broad enough to meet OIG’s criteria. As we reported before, OIG has disapproved the False Claims statutes of California, Florida, Louisiana, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, and Texas, as not as effective as the federal False Claims Act. No approval by OIG, no extra money for the state.

We will be discussing this new whistleblower statute, as well as others. Those who wish to read it can do so here:
(more…)

Has Iraq Fraud Cost Taxpayers Even More Than Previously Believed?

February 26, 2007
Michael Sullivan

Congressional Committee Explores Contractor Overcharges

Of great interest to whistleblower lawyers is how much suspected fraud and abuse has occurred in Iraq reconstruction contracts. Goverment auditors recently announced that they now believe that Iraq contractor fraud and abuse may be three times greater than the previous estimates–and may affect one out of every six dollars spent in the Iraq reconstruction effort.

The estimate has grown from $3.5 billion to more than $10 billion in “questioned and unsupported costs,” according to the Defense Contract Audit
(more…)

Comments–Whistleblower Lawyers, Other Attorneys, and Clients on the Whistleblower Lawyer Blog

February 22, 2007
Michael Sullivan

Since we began the Whistleblower Lawyer Blog to discuss topics of interest to attorneys, potential whistleblowers and others about developments in the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program, in qui tam litigation under the False Claims Act, and other whistleblower developments that might be of interest to other lawyers or whistleblowers, we have received some very positive feedback.

We have discussed not only how the IRS Whistleblower Program and the False Claims Act work, but we have also tried to highlight specific
(more…)

New Whistleblower Protections Approved by House Committee

February 21, 2007
Michael Sullivan

Recognizing how important whistleblowers are to stopping fraud, the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today approved the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (H.R. 985).

The new whistleblower protections would apply to federal employees and government contractors. The law would establish whistleblower protections for scientific, intelligence and transportation security employees. It would also apparently mean that officials would investigate whether security clearances are revoked as retribution for a whistleblower’s reporting allegations of waste, fraud or abuse.

Congressman Henry Waxman (D-Cal.) introduced the bill last week. Additional amendments would strengthen the effectiveness of the whistleblower provisions.

We find it very encouraging that Congress is taking such logical steps to protect the public’s money from waste, fraud and abuse.

The specific sections of the proposed new whistleblower law are as follows:

H.R.985 Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
(more…)

Medicare Fraud Indictments in Los Angeles

February 20, 2007
Michael Sullivan

We find it staggering to read about how blatant Medicare fraud can be, which often provokes a whistleblower to step forward. Today’s L.A. Times reports on a shameless scheme to defraud Medicare:

Elderly and mentally ill patients allegedly were offered doughnuts, candy and other gifts to lure them into more than $12 million worth of unnecessary respiratory treatments that were fraudulently billed to Medicare, according to the Indictment. Doctors and administrators were charged, according to this report.

What can you say about such criminality,
(more…)

State Whistleblower Act Is a Powerful Tool in Texas–But Could Produce Even More Medicaid Fraud Recoveries

February 20, 2007
Michael Sullivan

Whistleblower suits that reveal Medicaid fraud in Texas have grabbed the attention of the Texas Legislature–which apparently recognizes how powerful state False Claims Acts can be.

Today’s Houston Chronicle reports that Texas is working through a “backlog” of Medicaid fraud cases, the top 20 of which could bring another $700 million to the State (and presumably a significant amount to whistleblowers).

Whistleblower cases have been so effective that the legislators asked what more could be accomplished with more resources provided to pursue these fraud
(more…)

Watching the New IRS Whistleblower Procedures Take Shape

February 19, 2007
Michael Sullivan

We are excited to see the new IRS Whistleblower Office’s procedures being developed. We obtained a copy of a recent letter from IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson, describing how the new Whistleblower procedures are taking shape, to Senator Charles Grassley.

Senator Grassley has been instrumental in pushing for effective whistleblower laws, both in qui tam litigation under the False Claims Act, and now in the new IRS Whistleblower Program. Here is an excerpt of Commisioner Everson’s January 29, 2007 letter describing the implementation of the new IRS Whistleblower Program:

“The IRS has already taken steps to establish the new Whistleblower Office, which will report directly to the Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. This places the new office on par with other Operating divisions at the IRS. It will be headed by an IRS executive who has experience with IRS operations as well as with whistleblower operations in other government agencies. This executive should be assigned to the new position by February 4, 2007 [and our Whistleblower Lawyer Blog readers can learn about the new Director here] and will be available to attend your bipartisan roundtable discussion to obtain first-hand input from key stakeholders.

“The IRS Chief counsel and Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy are responsible for issuing the guidance required by the Tax Relief Act of 2006. Both offices are currently studying the legislation to identify areas and issues to be addressed in the guidance. They will obtain input from all interested parties, including the new executive in charge of the Whistleblower Office, to determine issues needing guidance. We are hopeful that the roundtable discussion will provide an opportunity to receive additional input. Chief Counsel and Tax Policy plan to issue this guidance within the one year timeframe required in the legislation.”
(more…)

Potential Whistleblowers: IRS Offers Program for Employers “Back-Dating” Stock Options

February 14, 2007
Michael Sullivan

We are encouraged that the IRS is taking action in response to the fraudulent practice of “back-dating” of stock options. Potential whistleblowers may wish to see the IRS’ description of its program to deal with an aspect of this problem.

Here is an excerpt from the IRS’ announcement of how it is permitting employers to “step forward” and pay a penalty, and a related IRS Release can be read here:

(From IRS Release:)

IRS Offers Opportunity for Employers to Satisfy Tax Obligations of Rank-and-File Employees with ‘Backdated’ Stock Options

IR-2007-30, Feb. 8, 2006
WASHINGTON – Internal Revenue Service officials today announced an initiative aimed at providing relief for rank-and-file employees affected by their companies’ issuance of backdated and other mispriced stock options. While the program will be available to help these employees who may be unaware that they held backdated options, the opportunity will not be available for backdated options exercised by most corporate executives or other insiders.

If an employee exercised a ‘backdated’ stock option in 2006, the employee may owe an additional 20-percent tax, plus an interest tax, under the Federal tax laws governing deferred compensation. If the option had been properly priced, the employee normally would only have owed income tax on the difference between the value at the date of grant and exercise.
(more…)

Search

Topics

Our Other Blog

International Tax Evasion Targeted by IRS Move to Revamp Its Large Business Division

August 5, 2010
Michael Sullivan

To battle offshore tax abuses and other international tax fraud and tax evasion, the IRS has announced that it is “realigning” and renaming its Large and Mid-Size Business (LMSB) division. To reflect its new emphasis, it will known as the “Large Business and International” division (LB&I).

As more transactions cross international borders, and more corporations and wealthy individuals use offshore tax havens and foreign low tax jurisdictions to avoid their tax obligations, the IRS is smart to focus more of its enforcement efforts in this way.

Based on our experience with tax whistleblowers, it is clear that the IRS Whistleblower Program is already seeing increasing numbers of tax whistleblower claims dealing with offshore tax abuses and other international tax issues.

The new IRS international unit will include a “transfer pricing” director, as well as a chief economist, who will oversee the IRS’s economic positions pertaining to transfer pricing.

(Transfer pricing, in ordinary language, involves a multinational company’s reallocating income or expenses between related entities in different countries with different tax rates to reduce taxes, by artificially increasing or decreasing the price one business entity charges another for goods, services, or intangibles. Transfer pricing cases can be good IRS Whistleblower claims.)

This action is the latest IRS step to address international tax evasion, including the investigation of the misuse of offshore accounts and foreign entities by U.S. taxpayers. Last fall, the IRS introduced a Global High Wealth Industry unit to improve monitoring of tax compliance by high income individuals, and their related enterprises.

Time will tell if the IRS succeeds in its stated goal “to create a more centralized organization dedicated to improving international tax compliance.”

The IRS announcement is reprinted below:
(more…)

Offshore Tax Havens Face Increasing Scrutiny, With IRS Whistleblowers Assisting

August 4, 2010
Michael Sullivan

“Offshore” accounts are an increasing priority of IRS enforcement, aided by the new IRS Whistleblower Program. The Offshore World has changed and will never be the same again. The traditional tax haven assurance of secrecy and anonymity won’t necessarily work any more.

The US has concluded Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEA’s) with a number of Offshore jurisdictions. Although the TIEA’s fall short of comprehensive Double Tax Treaties, they allow the IRS to obtain tax information about entities and accounts in Offshore jurisdictions under
(more…)

How Whistleblower Lawyers Work Alongside Government Lawyers In Successful Qui Tam Cases Under the False Claims Act

August 2, 2010
Michael Sullivan

When whistleblower attorneys bring a qui tam False Claims Act case, the most successful results usually occur when Government counsel and the whistleblower’s lawyers (Relator’s counsel) work together in what is known as the “public-private” partnership model.

This approach to qui tam cases allows the government to leverage its limited resources by calling on the resources provided by private attorneys. This is essentially a “joint prosecution effort, ” in which the government counsel and investigators can rely on Relator’s counsel at each stage,

–from the beginning of its investigation,

–to obtaining input for preparation of subpoenas for documentary evidence from the defendants,

–to review of evidence compiled by the government in response to subpoenas,

(more…)

New Rewards for Whistleblowers Reporting Bribery of Foreign Government Officials, Corporate Fraud In Foreign Government Contracts

July 21, 2010
Michael Sullivan

When the President signed the new financial reform bill into law today, new whistleblower provisions quietly took effect to battle corruption, bribery, and corporate fraud to obtain foreign government contracts.

This new law creates the new SEC whistleblower program that we have followed since its gestation after the Madoff scandal broke. The SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice share jurisdiction over a growing and increasingly important area of enforcement, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

Bribery of foreign government officials in international business transactions, and false entries in books and records of those companies within the statute, are the targets of the FCPA. Whistleblowers whose information helps the SEC recover monetary sanctions from those corrupt entities in FCPA cases now have an enforceable right to a monetary award of 10-30%.

Based on the increasing number and size of these FCPA cases, the rewards to whistleblowers can be meaningful–as they must be to cause whistleblowers to come forward. Over the past decade, the government has pursued more and more FCPA cases, and some recover hundreds of millions of dollars.

Recall that, in late 2008, Siemens agreed to pay more than $1.6 billion to the United States and Germany, after allegedly paying “$1.4 billion in bribes to government officials in Asia, Africa, Europe, the Middle East and the Americas.” Announcing the guilty plea and settlement, the government described “a corporate culture in which bribery was tolerated and even rewarded at the highest levels of the company.”

The SEC obtained $350 million in disgorgement from that settlement, which was the largest FCPA settlement to date.

In announcing that 2008 recovery, the government explained that “there is no question that the Department has in recent years significantly increased its FCPA enforcement. From 2001 to 2004, the Department resolved or charged 17 FCPA cases. For the period of 2005 to 2008, that number is 42 resolutions, representing an increase of more than 200 percent within these four years as compared to the prior four-year period.”

With money scarce both at home and abroad, it is even more urgent to recoup funds lost to fraud. The new SEC whistleblower awards and Commodity Futures Trading Commission rewards should prompt more efficient law enforcement efforts to stop this fraud, just as the False Claims Act and the new IRS Whistleblower Program have shown is possible.

This corruption harms legitimate businesses, who cannot compete when corruption prevents a level playing field. This crime also causes damage to others, as the government explained in announcing the Siemens settlement. That transcript is reprinted below, and in part states:

For let there be no doubt that corruption is not a victimless offense. Corruption is not a gentlemen’s agreement where no one gets hurt. People do get hurt. And the people who are hurt the worst are often residents of the poorest countries on the face of the earth, especially where it occurs in the context of government infrastructure projects, contracts in which crucial development decisions are made, in which a country will live by those decisions for good or for bad for years down the road, and where those decisions are made using precious and scarce national resources.

To illustrate the types of corruption this new whistleblower law should bring to light more often, the government’s announcement of the 2008 Siemens settlement is reprinted below:
(more…)

Whistleblowers Reporting Derivatives Fraud? Whistleblower Incentives Must Be Paid by CFTC Under New Financial Reform Bill

July 18, 2010
Michael Sullivan

The new financial reform bill that awaits the President’s signature this week has something important for potential whistleblowers with knowledge of fraud in options, futures, derivatives and other financial products within the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The bill will modify the Commodity Exchange Act to provide whistleblower rewards and protections.

Similar to the new SEC whistleblower awards for persons who reports securities fraud, the rewards to whistleblowers will be available if the CFTC recovers monetary sanctions of more than $1 million because of the whistleblower’s information.

Like SEC whistleblowers, CFTC whistleblowers will have an enforceable right to 10-30% of what the CFTC recovers in substantial cases when the whistleblower has “voluntarily provided original information to the Commission that led to the successful enforcement of the covered judicial or administrative action, or related action.” (Section 748 of Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, reprinted below).

Crucial to the success of these new whistleblower programs, whistleblowers will know that they will receive at least 10% of the recovery in significant cases when the whistleblower meets the law’s criteria.

The history of the nation’s major whistleblower statute, the False Claims Act, shows that guarantees of meaningful rewards are the critical element in causing whistleblowers to report substantial fraud. Fraud recoveries increased dramatically once Congress amended the False Claims Act in 1986 to provide meaningful whistleblower rewards of 15-25% in cases in which the government intervenes.

The new IRS Whistleblower Program is proving the same point, as quality submissions have poured in now that a right to a meaningful whistleblower award exists.

Congress has set forth general criteria for the CFTC to determine the amount of the award within the 10-30% range. Factors that the CFTC will consider include:

“(I) the significance of the information provided by the whistleblower to the success of the covered judicial or administrative action;

”(II) the degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and any legal representative of the whistleblower in a covered judicial or administrative action;

”(III) the programmatic interest of the Commission in deterring violations of the Act (including regulations under the Act) by making awards to whistleblowers who provide information that leads to the successful enforcement of such laws; and
”(IV) such additional relevant factors as the Commission may establish by rule or regulation”.
(more…)

New SEC Whistleblower Program Approved by Senate in Financial Reform Bill

July 17, 2010
Michael Sullivan

Since the SEC refused for years to heed Madoff whistleblower Harry Markopolis’ warnings that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, we have followed with great interest the efforts of those who sought to create the first meaningful SEC whistleblower program.

The Senate this week took an important step by authorizing a new SEC whistleblower program–one more potent than the SEC apparently wanted–as part of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

When the Madoff fiasco surfaced, Congress asked why the law failed to encourage SEC whistleblowers to come forward, in the same way the qui tam whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act have been so successful in rewarding whistleblowers for helping stop fraud against the government. Those same principles in the new IRS Whistleblower program have caused an explosion of valuable information presented by whistleblowers in exposing tax liability of many billions of dollars.

SEC leadership helped shape the tepid House version, which would have made rewards to whistleblowers wholly discretionary.

When we criticized the House version of the proposed SEC whistleblower rewards for that reason, staffers of the Senate Banking Committee contacted us to discuss what a meaningful whistleblower program should include, based on our experience with whistleblowers under the False Claims Act and IRS Whistleblower program. Our response was that, at minimum, a whistleblower with information about significant fraud must have a legally enforceable right to a meaningful reward.

Fortunately, the Senate version included such a right to an award of 10-30% in substantial cases, and the Senate view ultimately prevailed (see below text of whistleblower provisions in Section 922).

It remains to be seen how SEC leadership will respond. At this spring’s Offshore Alert Conference in Miami, an SEC official listened to his panelists describe how successful mandatory rewards have been in causing whistleblowers to come forward in False Claims Act cases and IRS Whistleblower claims, yet apparently failed to “get” that SEC whistleblowers need a similar incentive to come forward in the best cases.

In our experience in representing whistleblowers, persons with the most significant information will rarely come forward without an enforceable right to a meaningful reward. The SEC has not exactly fostered public confidence in its judgment in recent years. If it embraces whistleblowers as Congress has directed, the SEC will find that–like the IRS Whistleblower Office–it will receive better, and dramatically more, information about fraud within its jurisdiction.

The full text of section 922 regarding SEC whistleblowers is reprinted below:
(more…)

New IRS Procedures for Whistleblowers Should Encourage More Significant IRS Whistleblower Claims

July 1, 2010
Michael Sullivan

This morning’s Washington Post quotes me, among others, in criticizing one aspect of the new procedures for IRS whistleblowers recently published in the Internal Revenue Manual. That one glaring defect aside, the new IRM procedures are welcome news that should encourage more IRS whistleblowers to come forward.

Today’s Post article by David Hilzenrath on the IRS whistleblower procedures makes the following point, among others:

“There’s apparently an institutional resistance to rewarding whistleblowers that will take some time to dissipate,” said Michael A. Sullivan
(more…)

TARP Fraud and Other Violations Alleged by SEC Against Chairman of Major Mortgage Lender

June 16, 2010
Michael Sullivan

As we have written previously, the billions of “bailout” dollars to financial institutions through the TARP program inevitably would result in many fraud cases, including some by TARP whistleblowers.

Today, the SEC announced allegations of TARP fraud and securities fraud of more than $1.5 billion other violations against Lee B. Farkas, through his company Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (TBW).

According to the SEC, Farkas “sold more than $1.5 billion worth of fabricated or impaired mortgage loans and securities to Colonial Bank. Those loans and securities were falsely reported to the investing public as high-quality, liquid assets. Farkas also was responsible for a bogus equity investment that caused Colonial Bank to misrepresent that it had satisfied a prerequisite necessary to qualify for TARP funds. When Colonial Bank’s parent company – Colonial BancGroup, Inc. – issued a press release announcing it had obtained preliminary approval to receive $550 million in TARP funds, its stock price jumped 54 percent in the remaining two hours of trading, representing its largest one-day price increase since 1983.”

Perhaps the SEC is showing a new attitude after the Madoff debacle. Whistleblowers should soon be able to participate in the new SEC whistleblower program, which is part of the financial reform legislation now being hashed out in conference committee.

The SEC’s full release is reprinted below:
(more…)

New IRS Whistleblower Claim Procedures for Determining Awards to Whistleblowers Announced

June 16, 2010
Michael Sullivan

Today the long-awaited IRS Whistleblower Office procedures for determining awards to tax whistleblowers were announced in an update to the Internal Revenue Manual.

The new provisions for IRS Whistleblower claims address many details of how tax whistleblower claims will be handled. The full provisions are reprinted below:

Part 25. Special Topics
Chapter 2. Information and Whistleblower Awards
Section 2. Whistleblower Awards

25.2.2 Whistleblower Awards
25.2.2.1 Overview: Authority and Policy
25.2.2.2 General
25.2.2.3 Submission of Information for Award under Sections 7623(a) or (b)
25.2.2.4 Initial Review of the Form 211 by the Whistleblower Office
25.2.2.5 Grounds for Not Processing Claims for Award
25.2.2.6 Processing of the Form 211 7623(a) Claim for Award
25.2.2.7 Processing of the Form 211 7623(b) Claim for Award
25.2.2.8 Whistleblower Award Administrative Proceeding
25.2.2.9 Award Computation
25.2.2.10 Appeal Rights under section 7623(b)
25.2.2.11 Confidentiality of the Whistleblower
25.2.2.12 Funding Awards
25.2.2.13 Award Payment Procedures
25.2.2.14 Annual Report to Congress
Exhibit 25.2.2-1 1891 Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-2 Rejection Letter – 1010 Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-3 Acknowledgement Letter – Whistleblower Office
Exhibit 25.2.2-4 Debriefing Checksheet
Exhibit 25.2.2-5 Rejection Letter from the Whistleblower Office
Exhibit 25.2.2-6 Memorandum from Steven T. Miller, February 17, 2010
Exhibit 25.2.2-7 Sample Notice of Opportunity to Comment Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-8 Sample Summary Award Report
Exhibit 25.2.2-9 Award Recommendation-Opportunity to Comment
Exhibit 25.2.2-10 Confidentiality Agreement
Exhibit 25.2.2-11 Sample Preliminary Award Report
Exhibit 25.2.2-12 Sample Determination Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-13 Award Calculation Computation Guidelines (more…)

Offshore Tax Violations: Sen. Grassley Calls For Accounting of Use of UBS Information Provided by Tax Whistleblower

June 8, 2010
Michael Sullivan

Offshore tax evasion is a great priority for the IRS, and thus also the IRS Whistleblower Program.

Today, the leading advocate for robust whistleblower laws has called for the Treasury Department and the IRS to account for their use of information provided by the “UBS whistleblower,” Bradley Birkenfeld.

Sen. Chuck Grassley issued a press release today summarizing his letter to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman. Grassley commented on Swiss legislators’ move today to “unravel a U.S.-Swiss treaty that would allow for the disclosure of more client information to allow U.S. officials to review cases for potential enforcement of U.S. tax laws.”

“The action by Swiss legislators today to try to unravel an international treaty emphasizes the need for U.S. authorities to exhaust the information they have on U.S. taxpayers who use offshore accounts to evade taxes,” Grassley said. “Honest taxpayers deserve to know what’s happened with what could be very valuable leads, and if it’s nothing, they deserve to know why. It’s a matter of tax fairness and law enforcement. And the IRS shouldn’t wait for international agreements to fall into place when tax evaders can be identified through other appropriate tools.”

Grassley did not advocate for the UBS whistleblower’s release from federal prison, however, but focused on the government’s use of the information he provided. (See prior discussions of the UBS whistleblower’s case here).

Grassley, more than anyone, is responsible for passage of the December 2006 legislation that created the first meaningful IRS Whistleblower Program. The promising new IRS Whistleblower Program was inspired by the great successes of the nation’s primary whistleblower statute for exposing fraud, the False Claims Act.

Sen. Grassley’s announcement and letter today are reprinted below:
(more…)