Whistleblower Blog

Federal Contractor Fraud Laws To Get Tougher? ACORN Controversy Casts Spotlight on Larger Contractors That Violate False Claims Act

Outrage over misuse of public funds is a healthy reaction to those who cheat taxpayers. It can also create interesting bedfellows, as newly-introduced legislation in the House demonstrates.

HR 3571, aimed at “de-funding ACORN,” would ban federal contracts and most federal funds to any organization that “has filed a fraudulent form with any Federal or State regulatory agency,” among other things. (Complete bill is below.)

As. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) observed correctly, fraud by those who receive government funds involves much “bigger fish” than ACORN–and bigger dollar amounts of alleged fraud.

“We can’t have a situation where the laws of justice are applied to one organization and not to any of the others, particularly when there are organizations that are polluting water for our soldiers and electrocuting them.” Grayson presumably was referring to allegations that KBR’s performance of government contracts for our troops has caused soldiers to be electrocuted and otherwise endangered.

Rep. Grayson is on target. He saw these abuses as a lawyer vindicating the public’s interest in fighting fraud in pursuing qui tam whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act, the nation’s primary civil statute for combating fraud and false claims against the government.

(more…)

Calls Continue for a “False Claims Act” for Wall Street Whistleblowers

Since the Madoff and Stanford scandals, we have written about the calls for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to establish a meaningful whistleblower rewards program. Currently, no adequate incentives exist for whistleblowers to speak up when they might have a chance to stop large scale fraud and prevent the next Madoff or Stanford debacle. How much better off would so many Americans be if someone had exposed Madoff before he defrauded so many investors?

Forbes has run interesting column by Bill Singer, calling for a statute that apples “False Claims Act” whistleblower remedies to Wall Street. Why not protect investors from the massive losses that so many incurred? The current system obviously failed to do so. Harry Markopolis has described eloquently how the SEC could do so much better, and new SEC whistleblower rewards should make a huge difference.

We are already seeing the successes of another innovative law based on the same idea, the IRS Whistleblower Program. To stop those who would have you and I carry their share of the nation’s tax burden, private citizens are stepping forward with better and better information to provide to the IRS about significant tax cheating. The quality of the information that our clients are presenting is compelling, and some of it will help stop major abuses of the tax laws.
(more…)

New IRS Group to Address Offshore Accounts and Other International Tax Abuses by Wealthy Taxpayers

Offshore tax abuses and tax evasion have kept the IRS quite busy of late. The fast-approaching September 23 deadline for its “voluntary disclosure program,” and its agreement with UBS that will allow it to identify thousands of American taxpayers with offshore accounts, have added momentum to its efforts to combat offshore tax abuses by high net worth taxpayers.

Now, the IRS is creating a new group to “focus on examinations involving webs of entities and arrangements controlled by the high wealth taxpayer segment.” It will
(more…)

Protecting Whistleblowers from Criminal Prosecution: The Mystery of the UBS Whistleblower’s Prison Sentence

In one of two prominent whistleblower cases in the news this week, whistleblower John Kopchinski will be awarded more than $50 million for his role in exposing improper “off-label marketing” of the drug Bextra by Pfizer. Other whistleblowers also will be rewarded because of this settlement. That settlement of $2.3 billion is the largest in history ($1 billion to settle False Claims Act allegations, and $1.3 billion in criminal fine and forfeiture).

As large as the Pfizer settlement is, the other whistleblower’s actions seem likely to lead to recovery of dollars that could dwarf this $2.3 billion settlement. UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld has lifted the shroud of secrecy from thousands of American taxpayers’ offshore accounts at UBS. He has given the IRS a foothold into recovering potentially many billions in unpaid taxes owed.

Yet Birkenfeld was recently sentenced to serve 40 months in federal prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States in a tax fraud scheme while at UBS. His conviction also calls into question his ability to receive a reward under the IRS Whistleblower Program from the billions to be collected by the IRS.

How could this happen?

(more…)

Latest State “False Claims Act” Is Enacted in North Carolina

We have followed closely the trend of states enacting their own versions of the nation’s chief whistleblower law the False Claims Act. North Carolina has become the newest state to enact its own False Claims Act, which is reprinted below.

We congratulate the State of North Carolina on a momentous accomplishment.
(more…)

UBS and IRS Voluntary Discloure Program: Interesting Convergence for IRS Whistleblower Program

Offshore tax abuses have been an IRS priority for some time, but the impending September 23, 2009 deadline for the IRS “Voluntary Disclosure” program–combined with the recent announcement that UBS has agreed with the IRS to release 4,450 names of U.S. account holders–has created a flurry of activity for the IRS.

Anxious taxpayers with exposure cannot be sure that their names are not on the list being produced. Last week, the IRS added a 52nd “FAQ” about the Voluntary Disclosure Program to explain its application to UBS account holders:

Q52. Are UBS account holders eligible to make a voluntary disclosure under the IRS’s offshore Voluntary Disclosure Practice (VDP) announced on March 23, 2009, and set to expire September 23, 2009?

Yes, provided that the UBS account holder is otherwise eligible under the VDP. However, a UBS account holder becomes ineligible to make a voluntary disclosure under the offshore VDP at the time the IRS receives information from any source, including from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (“SFTA”), UBS, an informant, or otherwise, relating specifically to the account holder’s undisclosed foreign accounts or undisclosed foreign entities.

As part of the agreement with Switzerland and UBS announced by the IRS and the Department of Justice on August 19, 2009, UBS will be sending notices to account holders indicating that their information may be provided to the IRS under the agreement. If a UBS account holder gets this notification from UBS before September 23rd, this notification will not by itself disqualify the account holder from making a voluntary disclosure under the offshore VDP by the September 23rd deadline. Although many of these notices will not be sent by UBS to account holders until after September 23rd, the September 23rd offshore VDP deadline applies to all UBS account holders even if they have not received a notice by that date.(See https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=210027,00.html).

The IRS Whistleblower Program adds another element of suspense for non-compliant taxpayers. How many of these taxpayers may learn that the IRS Whistleblower Program has already identified them to the IRS?

And if not yet identified, how many taxpayers who will decline the benefits of voluntary disclosure by September 23 will be revealed to the IRS later through the very effective IRS Whistleblower Program?
(more…)

Court Agrees with IRS That Hospital CEO Is Personally Liable for Unpaid Payroll Taxes

Health care cases that our lawyers see most often involve whistleblowers who know of violations of the False Claims Act. While we also pursue many IRS violations under the IRS Whistleblower Program, the health care industry is not the source of most of those claims.

In perhaps a new trend, last week a federal court in Florida agreed with the IRS that a hospital CEO is personally liable for failing to pay over to the IRS close to $2 million in payroll taxes. (Doulgeris v. United States, M.D.Fla., August 03, 2009).

Earlier this year, the chairman of the board of a tax-exempt hospital was held personally liable for the hospital’s failing to collect and pay to the IRS payroll taxes, as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. (Verret v. United States, 5th Cir., 2009). The board chair, however, had extensive involvement in the operations of the entity.

Payroll tax fraud thus appears to remain an IRS priority. The reasoning of the Florida federal judge explains how the CEO was found personally liable for unpaid payroll taxes;
(more…)

The “Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act”–A “Mini-False Claims Act”

For a “webinar” on August 11, 2009, I have been asked to discuss not only potential liability under the False Claims Act for false or fraudulent claims to the federal government, but also what has been called the “Mini-False Claims Act”: the “Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act,” 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801-12,

Because it is not feasible for the government to handle under the False Claims Act every conceivable case of a false claim in procurement, the PFCRA was enacted so that smaller claims could be handled in an administrative process.

A major provision of the PFCRA, section 3802, is reprinted below:

Chapter 38. Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements
§ 3802. False claims and statements; liability
(a)(1) Any person who makes, presents, or submits, or causes to be made, presented, or submitted, a claim that the person knows or has reason to know–

(A) is false, fictitious, or fraudulent;

(B) includes or is supported by any written statement which asserts a material fact which is false, fictitious, or fraudulent;

(C) includes or is supported by any written statement that–

(i) omits a material fact;

(ii) is false, fictitious, or fraudulent as a result of such omission; and

(iii) is a statement in which the person making, presenting, or submitting such statement has a duty to include such material fact; or

(D) is for payment for the provision of property or services which the person has not provided as claimed,

shall be subject to, in addition to any other remedy that may be prescribed by law, a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each such claim. Except as provided in paragraph (3) of this subsection, such person shall also be subject to an assessment, in lieu of damages sustained by the United States because of such claim, of not more than twice the amount of such claim, or the portion of such claim, which is determined under this chapter to be in violation of the preceding sentence.
(more…)

Can IRS Whistleblower Program Help Offset Cost of Health Care Overhaul?

How to pay for health care in the United States, as costs inexorably grow?

The IRS Whistleblower Program may help by narrowing the “tax gap”–the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid each year. Treasury’s latest estimate is that $345 billion owed remains uncollected from those who engage in tax fraud, tax evasion, and other tax noncompliance. (“Update on Reducing the Federal Tax Gap and Improving Voluntary Compliance”).

Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus, D-Mont., raised this tax gap with the next IRS Chief Counsel, William J. Wilkins, on July 14: “We’re right now trying to figure how to pay for healthcare reform,” Baucus told Wilkins. “And it’s ironic that coincidentally, the amount we are trying to raise is that amount.”

The new IRS Whistleblower Program should dramatically improve the IRS’s efforts to close that tax gap. In December 2006, Congress authorized rewards of 15-30% paid to IRS whistleblowers who provide information that assists the IRS in collecting amounts owed to the IRS.

For the first time, IRS whistleblowers have an enforceable “right” to receive a reward. Early indications from the clients who have contacted us are that many substantial claims are being presented, including claims of over $1 billion owed to the IRS. (To see how the IRS Whistleblower Program works, see excerpts of this interview with IRS Whistleblower Office Director Steve Whitlock.)

Even the SEC is examining the success to date of the IRS program, in determining how the SEC might encourage and reward whistleblowers who come forward to reveal the next Madoff or Stanford.

Whistleblowers with solid information will help close the tax gap, and avoid imposing new taxes on the rest of the law-abiding Americans who pay their taxes.
(more…)

Whistleblower Attorneys Discuss False Claims Act Amendments & “The Most Pressing Issues in Representing Whistleblowers”

At the 20th Annual Convention of NELA, the National Employment Lawyers Association, I recently had the pleasure of moderating a panel discussion of some of the country’s top “whistleblower” lawyers. The topic was “The Most Pressing Issues in Representing Whistleblowers.”

Joining me in this panel discussion were Richard Renner and David J. Marshall. Richard is an attorney with Kohn & Colapinto in Washington, DC. and also serves as Legal Director of the National Whistleblowers Center. David is a partner with Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP
(more…)

How Do You Choose a Wrongful Death Lawyer in Duluth?

To choose a wrongful death lawyer in Duluth, consider the attorney’s experience with similar cases, ability to investigate complex claims, trial preparation, available resources, communication style, and fee structure.

Losing a family member because of possible negligence can leave you facing grief, financial concerns, and difficult legal decisions at the same time. Choosing legal representation should therefore involve more than selecting the first name shown in search results.

A lawyer should be able to determine who may file, preserve evidence, investigate fault, document the family’s losses, and deal with insurers or defense attorneys. The lawyer should also communicate with sensitivity and give the case the time it requires.

The right lawyer should explain the strengths and challenges of your case honestly without promising a specific result.

Georgia generally allows two years to file a wrongful death lawsuit, although exceptions may change the deadline.

Finch McCranie LLP has handled wrongful death and serious personal injury matters for more than 50 years.

The firm reports recovering more than $500 million in verdicts and settlements across its practices.

The firm has offices in Duluth and Atlanta.

A useful consultation should cover experience, strategy, communication, costs, and responsibility for the case.

Why Does Choosing the Right Lawyer Matter?

Choosing the right lawyer matters because wrongful death cases can involve disputed liability, multiple claims, expert evidence, significant damages, and strict filing requirements.

A wrongful death case is a civil claim arising when a person dies because of another party’s wrongful act, negligence, recklessness, or intentional conduct.

These cases may involve fatal truck collisions, medical malpractice, unsafe conditions, or other preventable events.

The lawyer must first determine whether the facts support a claim and identify the person authorized to bring it.

Georgia law generally gives priority to a surviving spouse, children, or parents, depending on the family structure. An estate representative may pursue certain related claims.

The lawyer may also need to distinguish between:

Wrongful Death Claim Estate Claim
Addresses the “full value of the life” of the deceased Addresses losses belonging to the deceased or estate
Usually pursued by eligible surviving relatives Usually pursued by the estate’s personal representative
May include economic and intangible components May include final medical expenses, funeral expenses, and the deceased’s conscious pain and suffering
Filing authority depends on the family structure Requires proper estate authority

These claims can overlap, but they are legally distinct. A qualified lawyer for wrongful death should identify every available claim and ensure that it is brought by the proper person.

What Experience Should the Lawyer Have?

The lawyer should have substantial experience with fatal-injury cases that resemble the circumstances of your family’s loss.

General courtroom experience is useful, but it does not automatically establish experience with wrongful death litigation.

Ask how frequently the attorney handles fatal injury claims and whether those cases involve similar issues.

Relevant experience may include:

  • Investigating deaths involving commercial trucks
  • Reviewing medical records in fatal malpractice claims
  • Identifying multiple responsible companies
  • Working with medical, financial, safety, or accident-reconstruction experts
  • Calculating economic and intangible losses
  • Taking depositions and presenting evidence at trial
  • Coordinating wrongful death and estate claims

See how a Duluth, GA wrongful death lawyer can investigate negligence, preserve evidence, identify responsible parties, and pursue an eligible family’s claim.

Do not rely on the number of years a person has held a law license alone. Ask how those years relate to complex wrongful death investigations, negotiations, and trials.

Have Questions About Wrongful Death Attorney Fees?
Get clear answers about fees, expenses, and your legal options during a confidential consultation.
Call (404) 341-5314

How Can You Evaluate the Lawyer’s Results?

Evaluate prior results for relevance and context rather than assuming that the largest advertised number predicts what will happen in your case.

Past results can show whether a lawyer has handled serious disputes, worked with complicated evidence, or taken cases through trial.

However, every death, family structure, insurance policy, defendant, and evidentiary record is different.

When reviewing results, ask:

  • Was the matter a wrongful death case?
  • Were liability and causation disputed?
  • Did it involve facts similar to this case?
  • Was the outcome obtained through settlement, judgment, or jury verdict?
  • What challenges did the lawyer have to overcome?
  • Who at the firm performed the principal work?

Finch McCranie LLP states that it has handled serious personal injury and wrongful death matters since 1966 and has recovered more than $500 million in verdicts and settlements across its practices.

These figures provide background about the firm, but they are not guarantees of a future result.

The firm’s broader Atlanta wrongful death attorney page provides additional information about its experience and approach to wrongful death claims.

What Questions Should You Ask During a Consultation?

Ask questions that reveal who will handle the case, how the firm will investigate it, what it will cost, and how your family will receive updates.

A consultation should help both the family and the attorney decide whether the relationship is a suitable fit.

Use this checklist:

  • How many wrongful death cases have you handled?
  • Have you handled cases involving similar facts?
  • Who will have primary responsibility for my case?
  • Will I communicate directly with an attorney?
  • What evidence needs to be preserved immediately?
  • What weaknesses or uncertainties do you see?
  • Which experts may be needed?
  • How will damages be evaluated?
  • Do you prepare cases for trial?
  • How often will I receive updates?
  • How are attorney fees and case expenses handled?
  • What happens if the case does not produce a recovery?

Pay attention to the clarity of the answers. A trustworthy wrongful death attorney should explain legal concepts in understandable language and acknowledge when an answer depends on further investigation.

Does the Lawyer Have Sufficient Resources?

The law firm should have the personnel, time, expert relationships, technology, and financial capacity needed to develop a serious wrongful death case.

Fatal injury litigation can require extensive records, witness interviews, site inspections, electronic data, depositions, expert testimony, demonstrative evidence, and months or years of preparation.

A larger firm is not automatically better, and a smaller firm is not automatically more attentive. The useful question is whether the wrongful death law firm can give your case the resources it reasonably requires.

A typical case may progress through the following stages:

Initial review: The lawyer examines available records and identifies filing authority, potential defendants, and deadlines.

Evidence preservation: Letters and legal notices may be sent to prevent relevant documents, video, equipment, or electronic records from being destroyed.

Independent investigation: Attorneys gather records, interview witnesses, inspect physical evidence, and consult qualified experts.

Claim evaluation: The legal team analyzes liability, causation, insurance coverage, and the family’s economic and intangible losses.

Filing and discovery: If a lawsuit is filed, the parties exchange records, take depositions, and challenge each other’s evidence.

Negotiation or trial: The parties may negotiate at several points, but the lawyer should remain prepared to present the case in court.

For a more detailed explanation of these stages, review the firm’s wrongful death lawsuit timeline .

How Should the Lawyer Communicate With Your Family?

The lawyer should communicate clearly, respond within a reasonable time, explain important decisions, and treat grieving family members with patience and respect.

Communication is not merely a customer-service issue. Families may need to make decisions about evidence, settlement offers, estate administration, discovery, and trial. They need enough information to make those decisions thoughtfully.

Before hiring an attorney, ask:

  • Who will provide routine updates?
  • How quickly does the firm usually return calls?
  • Can updates be provided by telephone, email, or video meeting?
  • Will the lawyer explain major filings and settlement offers?
  • How will disagreements among family members be handled?
  • Who should the family contact when the primary lawyer is unavailable?

Finch McCranie LLP describes its approach as compassionate and team-oriented, with an emphasis on returning calls, communicating clearly, and treating clients as its lawyers would want to be treated.

How Much Does Representation Cost?

Many wrongful death attorneys use contingency fees, but families should obtain a written agreement explaining the percentage, litigation expenses, and what happens if no recovery is made.

Under a contingency arrangement, the attorney’s fee is calculated as an agreed percentage of the amount recovered. This does not necessarily mean that every expense is automatically waived.

Ask whether potential expenses include:

  • Medical-record charges
  • Court filing and service fees
  • Expert consultation and testimony
  • Deposition transcripts
  • Accident reconstruction or testing
  • Travel and evidence-storage costs
  • Trial exhibits and demonstrative materials

The State Bar of Georgia advises clients to request a written fee agreement and ask questions about terms they do not understand. Clear terms at the beginning can help prevent later disagreements.

Never choose an attorney based only on the lowest fee. Compare the proposed fee with the lawyer’s experience, workload, resources, responsibilities, and willingness to prepare the claim fully.

Have Questions About Wrongful Death Attorney Fees?
Get clear answers about fees, expenses, and your legal options during a confidential consultation.
Call (404) 341-5314

Why Does Local Knowledge Matter in Duluth?

Local knowledge can help a lawyer understand the courts, agencies, roads, medical providers, and practical procedures connected to a Duluth wrongful death case.

Duluth is in Gwinnett County and is part of the larger Atlanta metropolitan area. Depending on the facts and defendants, a lawsuit may be filed in Gwinnett County or another proper venue.

Local familiarity may help when obtaining records, locating witnesses, arranging inspections, or working with professionals in the area. However, an office address by itself does not prove that an attorney has the experience required for a complex case.

A family searching for an experienced wrongful death lawyer near me should consider both convenience and capability. The stronger choice is usually the attorney who combines accessible communication with relevant legal and trial experience.

Finch McCranie LLP maintains an office at 3160 Main Street, Suite 102, Duluth, GA 30096, as well as an Atlanta office.

What Warning Signs Should You Avoid?

Avoid lawyers who guarantee an outcome, pressure you to sign immediately, give unclear answers about fees, or cannot explain who will handle the case.

Myth vs. Fact

✗ Myth: The lawyer with the biggest advertisement must be the best choice.

✓ Fact: Advertising does not establish relevant case experience, resources, or client service.

✗ Myth: Every wrongful death case has a predictable settlement value.

✓ Fact: Value depends on liability, evidence, family circumstances, damages, insurance, and other case-specific factors.

✗ Myth: A civil claim cannot proceed without criminal charges.

✓ Fact: Civil and criminal proceedings serve different purposes and use different standards.

✗ Myth: Every claim must go to trial.

✓ Fact: Some cases settle, but careful trial preparation may strengthen the negotiating position.

✗ Myth: Families have plenty of time to select a lawyer.

✓ Fact: Legal deadlines and disappearing evidence can make delay harmful.

Additional warning signs include:

  • Refusing to provide a written fee agreement
  • Making promises before reviewing the records
  • Avoiding questions about trial experience
  • Passing every question to nonlawyer personnel
  • Providing no plan for preserving evidence
  • Pressuring the family to accept an early settlement
  • Failing to identify potential conflicts of interest

For more clarification, review Wrongful Death Claim Myths and Facts Every Family Should Know .

How Should You Compare Your Final Choices?

Compare each lawyer using consistent criteria rather than relying only on advertising, personality, or a single case result.

Selection Factor What to Look For
Wrongful death experience Regular experience handling fatal-injury claims
Similar case experience Familiarity with cases involving comparable facts and legal issues
Trial preparation Ability and willingness to prepare the case for court
Evidence preservation A clear plan for securing records, footage, physical evidence, and witness statements
Experts and resources Access to appropriate experts, investigators, personnel, and technology
Communication Clear answers, reasonable response times, and regular case updates
Fee transparency A written agreement explaining fees, expenses, and payment terms
Personal trust Respectful treatment and genuine attention to your family’s concerns

No single factor should determine your choice. Consider whether the attorney listened carefully, answered difficult questions honestly, and explained the potential strengths and challenges of your case.

A consultation should give you a clearer understanding of your legal options. If you feel rushed, confused, or pressured, consider consulting another wrongful death attorney before signing an agreement.

What Should Your Family Do Next?

Your family should preserve available information, prepare focused questions, and speak with a qualified attorney before evidence disappears or a filing deadline passes.

Collect the documents already available without delaying the consultation. These may include death certificates, incident reports, medical records, photographs, videos, insurance correspondence, witness information, employment records, and funeral bills.

A missing police report does not necessarily prevent an investigation. Other evidence may help establish what occurred, as explained in Can a Duluth Wrongful Death Attorney Help if There’s No Police Report?

Georgia wrongful death deadlines can involve important exceptions, tolling rules, and related estate issues.

The general two-year period should not be treated as permission to wait. A case-specific review is necessary.

Choosing a lawyer is ultimately about finding the right combination of experience, resources, communication, preparation, and trust. No attorney can guarantee a result, but the attorney should be able to describe a careful and evidence-based path forward.

Have Questions About Wrongful Death Attorney Fees?
Get clear answers about fees, expenses, and your legal options during a confidential consultation.
Call (404) 341-5314

FAQ’s

What Questions Should I Ask a Wrongful Death Lawyer Before Hiring Them?

Ask about the lawyer’s relevant experience, trial preparation, investigation process, expert resources, communication policy, fees, and case expenses. You should also ask what potential strengths and challenges the lawyer identifies based on the currently available information.

Why Should I Hire a Lawyer for a Wrongful Death Claim?

A lawyer for wrongful death can investigate the circumstances, determine who may file, identify potentially responsible parties, preserve evidence, and document eligible losses. The lawyer can also communicate with insurers, negotiate a resolution, and prepare the case for court when necessary.

How Much Does a Wrongful Death Attorney Charge in Georgia?

Many wrongful death attorneys work under contingency-fee agreements, meaning their fee is based on an agreed percentage of the recovery. Review the written agreement carefully to understand the percentage, responsibility for case expenses, and what happens if no compensation is recovered.

How Soon Should I Contact a Wrongful Death Lawyer in Duluth?

Contact a lawyer as soon as you suspect that negligence or wrongful conduct contributed to the death. Prompt action may help preserve surveillance footage, electronic information, physical evidence, records, and witness recollections before they become unavailable.

Can I Speak With More Than One Wrongful Death Law Firm?

Yes. Consulting more than one firm can help you compare experience, proposed strategies, communication styles, resources, and fee terms. However, avoid unnecessary delays because legal deadlines and the availability of important evidence may affect the claim.

Can a Wrongful Death Attorney Estimate the Value of My Claim Immediately?

An attorney usually cannot provide a reliable estimate before investigating liability, damages, insurance coverage, and the circumstances of the deceased person’s life. Be cautious of anyone who guarantees a particular settlement or result during the initial consultation.

Should I Choose a Local Wrongful Death Lawyer in Duluth?

A local office can make meetings more convenient and may provide familiarity with Gwinnett County procedures, but location should not be the only consideration. Choose an attorney who offers the appropriate combination of relevant experience, investigative resources, trial preparation, communication, and trust.

What Are the Challenges of Defending Against Wrongful Death Allegations?

Defending a wrongful death lawsuit can involve significant legal, financial, and emotional challenges. 

These cases often include complex evidence, disputed facts, expert testimony, and substantial compensation claims.

However, an allegation does not automatically establish legal responsibility. 

The defense can challenge whether the defendant owed a legal duty, whether their conduct caused the death, and whether the claimed damages are supported by evidence. 

The defense may also examine who contributed to the incident and whether the lawsuit meets applicable legal requirements.

The Legal Grounds Behind a Wrongful Death Claim

A wrongful death claim generally arises when a person’s death is allegedly caused by another party’s negligence, recklessness, or wrongful conduct. 

Defendants may include individuals, businesses, healthcare providers, employers, property owners, or manufacturers.

These claims can result from motor vehicle accidents, medical malpractice, workplace accidents, defective products, dangerous property conditions, construction incidents, or nursing home abuse. 

The defense may challenge whether the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, caused the death, or whether the survivors suffered legally compensable losses.

Establishing What Truly Caused the Death

Causation is often a key issue in wrongful death cases. 

An injury or incident does not automatically prove that the defendant’s conduct caused the death, especially when underlying medical conditions or multiple factors are involved.

The defense may review medical records, autopsy findings, accident reports, and expert opinions to determine the actual cause of death. 

If the evidence does not establish a clear connection between the defendant’s conduct and the fatal outcome, the defense may challenge the causation element of the claim.

Challenging Claims of Negligence

Many wrongful death lawsuits are based on allegations of negligence. 

The defense may challenge whether the defendant acted unreasonably under the circumstances.

For example, in a fatal traffic accident, the plaintiff may allege that a driver was speeding or distracted. 

The defense may present evidence showing that the driver followed traffic laws or that another factor caused the collision.

In a premises liability case, a property owner may argue that they did not know about the dangerous condition or that the condition was not reasonably foreseeable.

Similarly, an employer accused of causing a workplace death may contend that appropriate safety procedures were in place and that the incident resulted from an unforeseeable event.

The defense may rely on witness testimony, photographs, surveillance footage, company policies, inspection records, and other documentation to challenge allegations of negligence.

Examining the Deceased Person’s Role in the Incident

In certain cases, the defense may argue that the deceased person’s own actions contributed to the accident or injuries.

For example, evidence may indicate that the deceased was speeding, failed to follow safety instructions, ignored warnings, or engaged in conduct that contributed to the incident.

Whether this argument affects the outcome depends on the jurisdiction. 

Some states follow comparative negligence rules, which may reduce compensation based on the percentage of fault assigned to the deceased. Other jurisdictions apply different standards that can have a greater impact on recovery.

The defense must therefore examine the deceased person’s actions carefully and determine whether there is credible evidence showing that those actions contributed to the fatal event.

This type of defense can be particularly sensitive because it involves discussing the conduct of someone who is no longer able to explain their actions. 

For that reason, the argument should be based on reliable evidence rather than assumptions.

Dealing With Complex Medical Causation

Medical malpractice wrongful death cases can be difficult because patients may have complex medical histories and multiple health conditions. 

The defense may argue that the provider followed the appropriate standard of care or that the underlying condition caused the death.

Medical experts may review records, test results, and treatment decisions to determine whether an alleged error directly caused the fatal outcome. 

Ultimately, proving that a medical mistake occurred is not enough; the plaintiff must also show that the mistake caused the death.

Sorting Through Conflicting Evidence

Wrongful death cases often involve evidence from multiple sources, which may sometimes conflict.

 Witness statements, police reports, medical records, and other documents may provide different accounts of what happened.

The defense must carefully assess the reliability of evidence such as accident reports, medical and autopsy records, photographs, security footage, vehicle data, and safety documents. 

While conflicting evidence does not automatically defeat a claim, inconsistencies may raise questions about what happened and whether the plaintiff can prove the required elements of the case.

Responding to Expert Witnesses

Expert witnesses often play an important role in complex wrongful death cases. 

They may provide opinions on medicine, accident reconstruction, workplace safety, product defects, or financial losses.

The defense may challenge an expert’s qualifications, methods, assumptions, or conclusions and present its own experts with alternative explanations. 

Carefully evaluating expert testimony and supporting evidence can be critical to the defense strategy.

Contesting the Amount of Compensation Claimed

The defense may also challenge the amount of compensation sought by the plaintiff. 

Depending on applicable law, claims may include medical and funeral expenses, lost income, financial support, household services, companionship, and emotional distress.

The defense may question whether these losses are supported by evidence or whether calculations are reasonable. Future financial losses and non-economic damages can be especially difficult to measure, often leading to disputes over the actual value of the claimed losses.

Addressing Multiple Potentially Responsible Parties

Some wrongful death cases involve multiple potentially responsible parties, such as employers, contractors, property owners, manufacturers, or drivers. 

The defense may investigate whether another party caused or contributed to the death.

Depending on applicable law, liability may be divided among multiple parties. 

Identifying all relevant parties can affect defense strategy, insurance coverage, settlement negotiations, and the allocation of liability.

Dealing With the Emotional Weight of the Case

Wrongful death cases are highly sensitive because of the profound impact on surviving family members. 

Defendants must present legal arguments carefully, especially when challenging the family’s claims or discussing the deceased person’s conduct.

The defense should focus on relevant evidence and applicable law rather than personal attacks. 

Respectful communication can help present legitimate legal arguments while protecting the defendant’s interests.

Raising Procedural and Legal Defenses

A wrongful death defense may involve procedural and legal issues unrelated to the underlying facts. 

The defense may question whether the plaintiff has the legal right to file the claim, whether it was filed on time, or whether required notices were properly provided.

Other issues may include naming the correct defendant and establishing the required elements of the claim.

 These issues can affect whether the case proceeds and often require careful review of applicable laws and court rules.

Preserving Evidence Before It Disappears

Early investigation is crucial in wrongful death cases because evidence can become harder to obtain over time. Witnesses may forget details, surveillance footage may be deleted, and physical conditions may change.

The defense may need to quickly preserve records, inspect the scene, review electronic data, interview witnesses, and consult experts. 

A prompt investigation can help uncover important facts and identify weaknesses in the allegations.

Settlement Negotiations and Trial Preparation

Not every wrongful death case goes to trial. Some are resolved through settlement, which can help avoid the time, expense, uncertainty, and emotional strain of prolonged litigation.

The defense must evaluate whether settlement is appropriate based on the evidence and potential liability.

If negotiations fail, the defense should be prepared to present evidence, question witnesses, challenge experts, and argue that the plaintiff has not proven the claim. 

Trial preparation can also strengthen settlement negotiations by clarifying the risks for both sides.

How a Defense Attorney Can Help

Wrongful death cases involve complex legal and factual issues. 

A defense attorney can investigate the allegations, evaluate evidence, and determine applicable defenses.

Depending on the case, an attorney may review the complaint, preserve evidence, interview witnesses, consult experts, challenge causation, dispute damages, identify other responsible parties, negotiate settlements, and prepare for trial. 

The defense strategy should be based on credible evidence and the specific facts of the case.

Final Thoughts

Defending a wrongful death claim can be challenging due to complex legal, emotional, and financial issues. 

The defense may need to challenge negligence and causation, respond to expert testimony, dispute damages, and address procedural requirements.

A strong defense begins with a thorough investigation, evidence preservation, and identification of all potentially responsible parties. 

If you or your organization faces a wrongful death claim, seeking legal guidance promptly can help protect your interests and determine the appropriate defense strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most common defense in a wrongful death case?

Common defenses may include disputing negligence, challenging causation, arguing that another party was responsible, or presenting evidence that the deceased person’s own actions contributed to the incident. The appropriate defense depends on the specific facts and applicable law.

Can a defendant argue that they did not cause the death?

Yes. Causation is often a central issue in wrongful death litigation. A defendant may present evidence showing that another event, medical condition, or party caused the death or that the alleged conduct was not the legal cause of the fatal outcome.

Can the deceased person be considered partly responsible?

In some jurisdictions, the defense may argue that the deceased contributed to the accident or injuries. Depending on the applicable negligence rules, this may reduce the compensation available to surviving family members or affect the claim in other ways.

How can a defendant challenge a wrongful death claim based on medical malpractice?

The defense may argue that the healthcare provider met the required standard of care or that the alleged error did not cause the death. Medical expert testimony is often important when evaluating these arguments.

What happens when several parties may be responsible?

The defense may investigate the conduct of other individuals or organizations that may have contributed to the death. Depending on applicable law, liability may be divided among multiple parties.

Hire Wrongful Death Lawyers After an Apartment Complex Shooting

A fatal shooting at an apartment complex can leave families facing not only the emotional impact of a sudden loss but also difficult questions about whether the tragedy could have been prevented.

Although the individual responsible for the shooting may face criminal prosecution, an apartment owner or property manager may also bear civil liability if inadequate security measures contributed to a foreseeable risk of violent crime. 

In Georgia, a wrongful death claim may allow eligible family members to seek compensation when negligent security or other breaches of a property owner’s duty of care are shown to have played a role in the death. 

Understanding how these claims work can help families evaluate their legal options after an apartment complex shooting. 

Why Legal Guidance Can Be Important After an Apartment Complex Shooting

The aftermath of a fatal apartment complex shooting can be overwhelming for surviving family members. 

Along with coping with the loss of a loved one, families may face questions about ongoing investigations, insurance communications, and whether anyone other than the shooter may bear legal responsibility.

Because criminal and civil proceedings serve different purposes, the outcome of a criminal case does not necessarily determine whether a wrongful death claim is available.

An attorney can explain how Georgia wrongful death law applies to the family’s circumstances, identify who may have the legal right to file a claim, and help ensure important deadlines are not overlooked. 

Early legal guidance can also help families understand the legal process, evaluate potential claims, and make informed decisions based on the specific facts of the case rather than assumptions or incomplete information.

Can an Apartment Shooting Lead to a Wrongful Death Claim?

Yes, a fatal apartment shooting may lead to a wrongful death claim under Georgia law if another party’s negligence contributed to the circumstances surrounding the death. 

Although the shooter may face criminal prosecution, a separate civil claim may be available if an apartment owner, property manager, security company, or another responsible party failed to exercise reasonable care in maintaining a reasonably safe property.

Not every apartment shooting gives rise to a wrongful death lawsuit. 

Whether a claim exists depends on the facts of the case, including the property’s conditions, the actions of those responsible for managing it, and whether there is evidence of negligence that may have contributed to the incident. 

Because these cases are highly fact-specific, talking to one of the best wrongful death lawyers can help families understand their legal rights, determine whether a claim may be available, and evaluate the options provided under Georgia law.

How Does a Wrongful Death Claim Work?

A wrongful death claim is a civil lawsuit that allows certain surviving family members, or in some cases the deceased person’s estate, to seek compensation when a person’s death is caused by another party’s negligent or wrongful conduct. 

Unlike a criminal case, which is brought by the government to determine criminal liability, a wrongful death claim focuses on whether another party can be held financially responsible for the losses resulting from the death.

The process typically begins with evaluating the circumstances of the incident to determine whether a valid legal claim exists. 

If appropriate, the claim is filed against the party or parties alleged to have contributed to the death. 

During the case, both sides may exchange evidence, interview witnesses, and present expert opinions before attempting to resolve the matter through settlement or, if necessary, litigation. 

Because Georgia law governs who may file a wrongful death claim and establishes specific procedural requirements and deadlines, consulting a wrongful death lawyer can help families understand how the process applies to their particular situation.

When Can an Apartment Complex Be Liable?

An apartment complex is not automatically responsible whenever a fatal shooting occurs on its property. 

Liability depends on whether the owner, management company, or another responsible party failed to meet its legal duty to maintain reasonably safe premises under the circumstances. 

In Georgia, this often requires showing that the property owner knew or should have known about a safety risk and failed to take reasonable steps to address it.

Whether an apartment complex may be held liable depends on the specific facts of the case. 

Factors such as the property’s security measures, maintenance of access points, prior safety concerns, and the circumstances surrounding the shooting may all be considered. 

These cases frequently involve complex legal and factual issues, determining liability usually requires a careful review of the available evidence and applicable Georgia law.

Why Hiring a Wrongful Death Lawyer Matters

Wrongful death claims arising from apartment complex shootings often involve multiple parties, extensive records, and disputed questions of liability. 

Property owners, management companies, security contractors, and insurers may each have different positions regarding responsibility. 

An experienced wrongful death lawyer can evaluate the facts, identify potentially liable parties, explain how Georgia law applies to the case, and guide families through each stage of the legal process.

Legal representation can also help ensure that important records are obtained, filing deadlines are met, and communications with insurers and opposing parties are handled appropriately. 

While no attorney can guarantee the outcome of a case, timely legal guidance can help families understand their rights and make informed decisions based on the available evidence.

What Compensation May Be Available in an Apartment Shooting Wrongful Death Claim?

A wrongful death claim may provide compensation for the financial and personal losses resulting from the death of a loved one. 

The amount and type of compensation available depend on the circumstances of the case and the damages recognized under applicable law. 

As every claim is unique, compensation is determined on an individual basis rather than through a fixed formula.

Depending on the facts, eligible family members may seek compensation for the full value of the deceased person’s life, as well as funeral and burial expenses, medical costs incurred before death, and the loss of financial support or services the deceased would have provided.

In certain situations, the deceased person’s estate may also pursue separate claims for damages arising before death, such as medical expenses and conscious pain and suffering, when supported by the circumstances.

A wrongful death lawyer can explain the categories of damages that may apply, answer questions about the claims process, and help families understand the compensation that may be available based on their particular situation.

Conclusion

Every apartment shooting case presents its own legal and factual challenges. 

A thorough evaluation of the circumstances can help determine the appropriate course of action and whether a civil claim may be available. 

Seeking timely legal advice allows families to better understand their options moving forward. 

Compassionate Legal Support When You Need It Most 

Losing a loved one in an apartment complex shooting is a devastating experience, and families are often left with unanswered questions about what happened and whether someone else may share legal responsibility. 

During this difficult time, understanding your rights and the legal process can feel overwhelming.

Finch McCranie LLP provides compassionate legal guidance to families seeking answers after a fatal apartment complex shooting. 

Our firm can access the circumstances of the incident, identify potentially responsible parties, explain the claims process, and help protect your family’s interests throughout the case.

If you have lost a loved one in an apartment complex shooting, you can consult with a wrongful death lawyer to know your legal options and make informed decisions about the next steps. 

For more information, schedule a consultation and discuss your situation with an experienced attorney.

FAQs

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Claim After an Apartment Complex Shooting?

The right to file a wrongful death claim depends on the relationship between the deceased and the surviving family members. Because eligibility is determined by state law and individual circumstances, it is important to obtain legal guidance before taking action.

Can an Apartment Complex Be Held Responsible for a Fatal Shooting?

An apartment complex may be legally responsible if its actions or failures contributed to conditions that increased the risk of a fatal shooting. Whether liability exists depends on the specific facts and the responsibilities of those involved in managing the property.

Can a Civil Wrongful Death Claim Proceed if There Is a Criminal Case?

Yes, a wrongful death claim is a civil matter that is independent of any criminal prosecution. Families may have the option to pursue a civil claim even while a criminal investigation or court proceeding is ongoing.

What Documents May Be Helpful When Discussing a Wrongful Death Case?

Any information related to the incident may be useful, including police reports, medical records, photographs, insurance correspondence, witness information, or other available documents. If certain records are unavailable, an attorney can advise on how they may be obtained.

Can More Than One Party Be Named in a Wrongful Death Lawsuit?

Depending on the circumstances, a wrongful death claim may involve multiple defendants if more than one person or entity is alleged to have contributed to the events leading to the death. The parties involved vary based on the facts of each case. A wrongful death attorney can review the available information, identify potentially responsible parties, and explain whether claims may be brought against one or multiple defendants. 

How to Know If You Have a Medical Malpractice Case

Medical treatment does not always lead to the outcome a patient expects.

Some treatments are unsuccessful even when doctors follow the proper standard of care.

However, there are situations where a medical provider makes a preventable mistake that causes serious harm.

When that happens, the patient may have grounds for a medical malpractice claim.

Many people are unsure whether what happened to them qualifies as medical malpractice.

They may know something went wrong, but they are not sure if the mistake was avoidable or if the provider can be held legally responsible.

(more…)

How Much Can You Recover in a Wrongful Death Lawsuit?

Wrongful death lawsuit compensation in Georgia is based on the full value of the life of the person who passed away due to another party’s negligence. 

When a family loses a loved one in a preventable accident, the emotional loss is overwhelming. 

At the same time, financial pressures often intensify due to lost income, medical bills, and funeral expenses.

Georgia law allows certain family members to pursue compensation for death by negligence. The amount recovered depends on multiple legal, financial, and factual factors. 

(more…)

Navigating Truck Accident Lawsuits: Product Liability & Medical Malpractice

In the realm of personal injury law, few incidents carry the potential for devastation, quite like truck accidents. These collisions often result in severe injuries, significant property damage, and, tragically, loss of life. When such accidents occur, victims and their families are thrust into a complex legal landscape where multiple factors may contribute to the incident’s cause and subsequent liability.

Understanding Truck Accident Lawsuits

Truck accident lawsuits are legal proceedings initiated by individuals who have suffered harm due to a collision involving a commercial truck. These lawsuits seek to hold responsible parties accountable for their negligence or misconduct, with the ultimate goal of securing compensation for the victim’s damages.

(more…)

Top 10 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Truck Accident Lawyer

In the aftermath of a truck accident, navigating legal proceedings can be overwhelming. From mounting medical bills to complex insurance claims, victims often find themselves in need of legal assistance. Choosing the right truck accident lawyer is crucial to ensuring fair compensation and navigating the complexities of the legal system. To aid in this process, here are the top 10 questions to ask before hiring a truck accident lawyer.

10 questions to ask before hiring a truck accident lawyer

(more…)

Register for 2024 “Whistleblower Law Symposium”–Live Event (Virtually) on March 13

For many years, Michael Sullivan of our firm and his colleague Jim Breen have organized the “Whistleblower Law Symposium.” It has consistently received high marks from participants. 

This year’s Symposium will be available either in-person or online on Wednesday, March 13, starting at 815 am EDT.  It offers 7.5 CLE hours, including 1 Ethics hour and 4 Trial Practice hours. Cost is $279.  

You can register (and see the full Agenda) here: atlantabar.org/….   Topics include: 

(more…)

The Silent Battle: How to Win Your Medical Negligence Lawsuit

Medical negligence lawsuits can be daunting, but understanding the intricacies of the legal process is crucial for success. 

In this guide, we’ll navigate the silent battle of medical negligence lawsuits, shedding light on critical aspects, strategies, and tips to help you emerge victorious.

Understanding Medical Negligence

Medical negligence occurs when a healthcare professional deviates from the standard of care, harming the patient. 

It’s essential to recognize the signs and understand that not all medical complications result from negligence.

(more…)

Hiring the Right Advocate: A Guide to Medical Negligence Attorneys in Atlanta

Pursuing justice in medical negligence cases in Atlanta requires a skilled legal ally. 

Finding the right attorney is crucial when you or a loved one has experienced harm due to medical malpractice. 

A Medical Negligence Attorney in Atlanta can be the key to navigating the complex legal terrain and securing the compensation you deserve.

Understanding Medical Negligence

Medical negligence, also known as medical malpractice, occurs when a healthcare professional fails to provide the standard of care expected in their field, harming the patient. 

(more…)