Whistleblower Blog

International Tax Evasion Targeted by IRS Move to Revamp Its Large Business Division

To battle offshore tax abuses and other international tax fraud and tax evasion, the IRS has announced that it is “realigning” and renaming its Large and Mid-Size Business (LMSB) division. To reflect its new emphasis, it will known as the “Large Business and International” division (LB&I).

As more transactions cross international borders, and more corporations and wealthy individuals use offshore tax havens and foreign low tax jurisdictions to avoid their tax obligations, the IRS is smart to focus more of its enforcement efforts in this way.

Based on our experience with tax whistleblowers, it is clear that the IRS Whistleblower Program is already seeing increasing numbers of tax whistleblower claims dealing with offshore tax abuses and other international tax issues.

The new IRS international unit will include a “transfer pricing” director, as well as a chief economist, who will oversee the IRS’s economic positions pertaining to transfer pricing.

(Transfer pricing, in ordinary language, involves a multinational company’s reallocating income or expenses between related entities in different countries with different tax rates to reduce taxes, by artificially increasing or decreasing the price one business entity charges another for goods, services, or intangibles. Transfer pricing cases can be good IRS Whistleblower claims.)

This action is the latest IRS step to address international tax evasion, including the investigation of the misuse of offshore accounts and foreign entities by U.S. taxpayers. Last fall, the IRS introduced a Global High Wealth Industry unit to improve monitoring of tax compliance by high income individuals, and their related enterprises.

Time will tell if the IRS succeeds in its stated goal “to create a more centralized organization dedicated to improving international tax compliance.”

The IRS announcement is reprinted below:
(more…)

Offshore Tax Havens Face Increasing Scrutiny, With IRS Whistleblowers Assisting

“Offshore” accounts are an increasing priority of IRS enforcement, aided by the new IRS Whistleblower Program. The Offshore World has changed and will never be the same again. The traditional tax haven assurance of secrecy and anonymity won’t necessarily work any more.

The US has concluded Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEA’s) with a number of Offshore jurisdictions. Although the TIEA’s fall short of comprehensive Double Tax Treaties, they allow the IRS to obtain tax information about entities and accounts in Offshore jurisdictions under
(more…)

How Whistleblower Lawyers Work Alongside Government Lawyers In Successful Qui Tam Cases Under the False Claims Act

When whistleblower attorneys bring a qui tam False Claims Act case, the most successful results usually occur when Government counsel and the whistleblower’s lawyers (Relator’s counsel) work together in what is known as the “public-private” partnership model.

This approach to qui tam cases allows the government to leverage its limited resources by calling on the resources provided by private attorneys. This is essentially a “joint prosecution effort, ” in which the government counsel and investigators can rely on Relator’s counsel at each stage,

–from the beginning of its investigation,

–to obtaining input for preparation of subpoenas for documentary evidence from the defendants,

–to review of evidence compiled by the government in response to subpoenas,

(more…)

New Rewards for Whistleblowers Reporting Bribery of Foreign Government Officials, Corporate Fraud In Foreign Government Contracts

When the President signed the new financial reform bill into law today, new whistleblower provisions quietly took effect to battle corruption, bribery, and corporate fraud to obtain foreign government contracts.

This new law creates the new SEC whistleblower program that we have followed since its gestation after the Madoff scandal broke. The SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice share jurisdiction over a growing and increasingly important area of enforcement, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

Bribery of foreign government officials in international business transactions, and false entries in books and records of those companies within the statute, are the targets of the FCPA. Whistleblowers whose information helps the SEC recover monetary sanctions from those corrupt entities in FCPA cases now have an enforceable right to a monetary award of 10-30%.

Based on the increasing number and size of these FCPA cases, the rewards to whistleblowers can be meaningful–as they must be to cause whistleblowers to come forward. Over the past decade, the government has pursued more and more FCPA cases, and some recover hundreds of millions of dollars.

Recall that, in late 2008, Siemens agreed to pay more than $1.6 billion to the United States and Germany, after allegedly paying “$1.4 billion in bribes to government officials in Asia, Africa, Europe, the Middle East and the Americas.” Announcing the guilty plea and settlement, the government described “a corporate culture in which bribery was tolerated and even rewarded at the highest levels of the company.”

The SEC obtained $350 million in disgorgement from that settlement, which was the largest FCPA settlement to date.

In announcing that 2008 recovery, the government explained that “there is no question that the Department has in recent years significantly increased its FCPA enforcement. From 2001 to 2004, the Department resolved or charged 17 FCPA cases. For the period of 2005 to 2008, that number is 42 resolutions, representing an increase of more than 200 percent within these four years as compared to the prior four-year period.”

With money scarce both at home and abroad, it is even more urgent to recoup funds lost to fraud. The new SEC whistleblower awards and Commodity Futures Trading Commission rewards should prompt more efficient law enforcement efforts to stop this fraud, just as the False Claims Act and the new IRS Whistleblower Program have shown is possible.

This corruption harms legitimate businesses, who cannot compete when corruption prevents a level playing field. This crime also causes damage to others, as the government explained in announcing the Siemens settlement. That transcript is reprinted below, and in part states:

For let there be no doubt that corruption is not a victimless offense. Corruption is not a gentlemen’s agreement where no one gets hurt. People do get hurt. And the people who are hurt the worst are often residents of the poorest countries on the face of the earth, especially where it occurs in the context of government infrastructure projects, contracts in which crucial development decisions are made, in which a country will live by those decisions for good or for bad for years down the road, and where those decisions are made using precious and scarce national resources.

To illustrate the types of corruption this new whistleblower law should bring to light more often, the government’s announcement of the 2008 Siemens settlement is reprinted below:
(more…)

Whistleblowers Reporting Derivatives Fraud? Whistleblower Incentives Must Be Paid by CFTC Under New Financial Reform Bill

The new financial reform bill that awaits the President’s signature this week has something important for potential whistleblowers with knowledge of fraud in options, futures, derivatives and other financial products within the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The bill will modify the Commodity Exchange Act to provide whistleblower rewards and protections.

Similar to the new SEC whistleblower awards for persons who reports securities fraud, the rewards to whistleblowers will be available if the CFTC recovers monetary sanctions of more than $1 million because of the whistleblower’s information.

Like SEC whistleblowers, CFTC whistleblowers will have an enforceable right to 10-30% of what the CFTC recovers in substantial cases when the whistleblower has “voluntarily provided original information to the Commission that led to the successful enforcement of the covered judicial or administrative action, or related action.” (Section 748 of Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, reprinted below).

Crucial to the success of these new whistleblower programs, whistleblowers will know that they will receive at least 10% of the recovery in significant cases when the whistleblower meets the law’s criteria.

The history of the nation’s major whistleblower statute, the False Claims Act, shows that guarantees of meaningful rewards are the critical element in causing whistleblowers to report substantial fraud. Fraud recoveries increased dramatically once Congress amended the False Claims Act in 1986 to provide meaningful whistleblower rewards of 15-25% in cases in which the government intervenes.

The new IRS Whistleblower Program is proving the same point, as quality submissions have poured in now that a right to a meaningful whistleblower award exists.

Congress has set forth general criteria for the CFTC to determine the amount of the award within the 10-30% range. Factors that the CFTC will consider include:

“(I) the significance of the information provided by the whistleblower to the success of the covered judicial or administrative action;

”(II) the degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and any legal representative of the whistleblower in a covered judicial or administrative action;

”(III) the programmatic interest of the Commission in deterring violations of the Act (including regulations under the Act) by making awards to whistleblowers who provide information that leads to the successful enforcement of such laws; and
”(IV) such additional relevant factors as the Commission may establish by rule or regulation”
.
(more…)

New SEC Whistleblower Program Approved by Senate in Financial Reform Bill

Since the SEC refused for years to heed Madoff whistleblower Harry Markopolis’ warnings that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, we have followed with great interest the efforts of those who sought to create the first meaningful SEC whistleblower program.

The Senate this week took an important step by authorizing a new SEC whistleblower program–one more potent than the SEC apparently wanted–as part of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

When the Madoff fiasco surfaced, Congress asked why the law failed to encourage SEC whistleblowers to come forward, in the same way the qui tam whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act have been so successful in rewarding whistleblowers for helping stop fraud against the government. Those same principles in the new IRS Whistleblower program have caused an explosion of valuable information presented by whistleblowers in exposing tax liability of many billions of dollars.

SEC leadership helped shape the tepid House version, which would have made rewards to whistleblowers wholly discretionary.

When we criticized the House version of the proposed SEC whistleblower rewards for that reason, staffers of the Senate Banking Committee contacted us to discuss what a meaningful whistleblower program should include, based on our experience with whistleblowers under the False Claims Act and IRS Whistleblower program. Our response was that, at minimum, a whistleblower with information about significant fraud must have a legally enforceable right to a meaningful reward.

Fortunately, the Senate version included such a right to an award of 10-30% in substantial cases, and the Senate view ultimately prevailed (see below text of whistleblower provisions in Section 922).

It remains to be seen how SEC leadership will respond. At this spring’s Offshore Alert Conference in Miami, an SEC official listened to his panelists describe how successful mandatory rewards have been in causing whistleblowers to come forward in False Claims Act cases and IRS Whistleblower claims, yet apparently failed to “get” that SEC whistleblowers need a similar incentive to come forward in the best cases.

In our experience in representing whistleblowers, persons with the most significant information will rarely come forward without an enforceable right to a meaningful reward. The SEC has not exactly fostered public confidence in its judgment in recent years. If it embraces whistleblowers as Congress has directed, the SEC will find that–like the IRS Whistleblower Office–it will receive better, and dramatically more, information about fraud within its jurisdiction.

The full text of section 922 regarding SEC whistleblowers is reprinted below:
(more…)

New IRS Procedures for Whistleblowers Should Encourage More Significant IRS Whistleblower Claims

This morning’s Washington Post quotes me, among others, in criticizing one aspect of the new procedures for IRS whistleblowers recently published in the Internal Revenue Manual. That one glaring defect aside, the new IRM procedures are welcome news that should encourage more IRS whistleblowers to come forward.

Today’s Post article by David Hilzenrath on the IRS whistleblower procedures makes the following point, among others:

“There’s apparently an institutional resistance to rewarding whistleblowers that will take some time to dissipate,” said Michael A. Sullivan
(more…)

TARP Fraud and Other Violations Alleged by SEC Against Chairman of Major Mortgage Lender

As we have written previously, the billions of “bailout” dollars to financial institutions through the TARP program inevitably would result in many fraud cases, including some by TARP whistleblowers.

Today, the SEC announced allegations of TARP fraud and securities fraud of more than $1.5 billion other violations against Lee B. Farkas, through his company Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (TBW).

According to the SEC, Farkas “sold more than $1.5 billion worth of fabricated or impaired mortgage loans and securities to Colonial Bank. Those loans and securities were falsely reported to the investing public as high-quality, liquid assets. Farkas also was responsible for a bogus equity investment that caused Colonial Bank to misrepresent that it had satisfied a prerequisite necessary to qualify for TARP funds. When Colonial Bank’s parent company – Colonial BancGroup, Inc. – issued a press release announcing it had obtained preliminary approval to receive $550 million in TARP funds, its stock price jumped 54 percent in the remaining two hours of trading, representing its largest one-day price increase since 1983.”

Perhaps the SEC is showing a new attitude after the Madoff debacle. Whistleblowers should soon be able to participate in the new SEC whistleblower program, which is part of the financial reform legislation now being hashed out in conference committee.

The SEC’s full release is reprinted below:
(more…)

New IRS Whistleblower Claim Procedures for Determining Awards to Whistleblowers Announced

Today the long-awaited IRS Whistleblower Office procedures for determining awards to tax whistleblowers were announced in an update to the Internal Revenue Manual.

The new provisions for IRS Whistleblower claims address many details of how tax whistleblower claims will be handled. The full provisions are reprinted below:

Part 25. Special Topics
Chapter 2. Information and Whistleblower Awards
Section 2. Whistleblower Awards

25.2.2 Whistleblower Awards
25.2.2.1 Overview: Authority and Policy
25.2.2.2 General
25.2.2.3 Submission of Information for Award under Sections 7623(a) or (b)
25.2.2.4 Initial Review of the Form 211 by the Whistleblower Office
25.2.2.5 Grounds for Not Processing Claims for Award
25.2.2.6 Processing of the Form 211 7623(a) Claim for Award
25.2.2.7 Processing of the Form 211 7623(b) Claim for Award
25.2.2.8 Whistleblower Award Administrative Proceeding
25.2.2.9 Award Computation
25.2.2.10 Appeal Rights under section 7623(b)
25.2.2.11 Confidentiality of the Whistleblower
25.2.2.12 Funding Awards
25.2.2.13 Award Payment Procedures
25.2.2.14 Annual Report to Congress
Exhibit 25.2.2-1 1891 Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-2 Rejection Letter – 1010 Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-3 Acknowledgement Letter – Whistleblower Office
Exhibit 25.2.2-4 Debriefing Checksheet
Exhibit 25.2.2-5 Rejection Letter from the Whistleblower Office
Exhibit 25.2.2-6 Memorandum from Steven T. Miller, February 17, 2010
Exhibit 25.2.2-7 Sample Notice of Opportunity to Comment Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-8 Sample Summary Award Report
Exhibit 25.2.2-9 Award Recommendation-Opportunity to Comment
Exhibit 25.2.2-10 Confidentiality Agreement
Exhibit 25.2.2-11 Sample Preliminary Award Report
Exhibit 25.2.2-12 Sample Determination Letter
Exhibit 25.2.2-13 Award Calculation Computation Guidelines (more…)

Offshore Tax Violations: Sen. Grassley Calls For Accounting of Use of UBS Information Provided by Tax Whistleblower

Offshore tax evasion is a great priority for the IRS, and thus also the IRS Whistleblower Program.

Today, the leading advocate for robust whistleblower laws has called for the Treasury Department and the IRS to account for their use of information provided by the “UBS whistleblower,” Bradley Birkenfeld.

Sen. Chuck Grassley issued a press release today summarizing his letter to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman. Grassley commented on Swiss legislators’ move today to “unravel a U.S.-Swiss treaty that would allow for the disclosure of more client information to allow U.S. officials to review cases for potential enforcement of U.S. tax laws.”

“The action by Swiss legislators today to try to unravel an international treaty emphasizes the need for U.S. authorities to exhaust the information they have on U.S. taxpayers who use offshore accounts to evade taxes,” Grassley said. “Honest taxpayers deserve to know what’s happened with what could be very valuable leads, and if it’s nothing, they deserve to know why. It’s a matter of tax fairness and law enforcement. And the IRS shouldn’t wait for international agreements to fall into place when tax evaders can be identified through other appropriate tools.”

Grassley did not advocate for the UBS whistleblower’s release from federal prison, however, but focused on the government’s use of the information he provided. (See prior discussions of the UBS whistleblower’s case here).

Grassley, more than anyone, is responsible for passage of the December 2006 legislation that created the first meaningful IRS Whistleblower Program. The promising new IRS Whistleblower Program was inspired by the great successes of the nation’s primary whistleblower statute for exposing fraud, the False Claims Act.

Sen. Grassley’s announcement and letter today are reprinted below:
(more…)

How Do You Choose a Wrongful Death Lawyer in Duluth?

To choose a wrongful death lawyer in Duluth, consider the attorney’s experience with similar cases, ability to investigate complex claims, trial preparation, available resources, communication style, and fee structure.

Losing a family member because of possible negligence can leave you facing grief, financial concerns, and difficult legal decisions at the same time. Choosing legal representation should therefore involve more than selecting the first name shown in search results.

A lawyer should be able to determine who may file, preserve evidence, investigate fault, document the family’s losses, and deal with insurers or defense attorneys. The lawyer should also communicate with sensitivity and give the case the time it requires.

The right lawyer should explain the strengths and challenges of your case honestly without promising a specific result.

Georgia generally allows two years to file a wrongful death lawsuit, although exceptions may change the deadline.

Finch McCranie LLP has handled wrongful death and serious personal injury matters for more than 50 years.

The firm reports recovering more than $500 million in verdicts and settlements across its practices.

The firm has offices in Duluth and Atlanta.

A useful consultation should cover experience, strategy, communication, costs, and responsibility for the case.

Why Does Choosing the Right Lawyer Matter?

Choosing the right lawyer matters because wrongful death cases can involve disputed liability, multiple claims, expert evidence, significant damages, and strict filing requirements.

A wrongful death case is a civil claim arising when a person dies because of another party’s wrongful act, negligence, recklessness, or intentional conduct.

These cases may involve fatal truck collisions, medical malpractice, unsafe conditions, or other preventable events.

The lawyer must first determine whether the facts support a claim and identify the person authorized to bring it.

Georgia law generally gives priority to a surviving spouse, children, or parents, depending on the family structure. An estate representative may pursue certain related claims.

The lawyer may also need to distinguish between:

Wrongful Death Claim Estate Claim
Addresses the “full value of the life” of the deceased Addresses losses belonging to the deceased or estate
Usually pursued by eligible surviving relatives Usually pursued by the estate’s personal representative
May include economic and intangible components May include final medical expenses, funeral expenses, and the deceased’s conscious pain and suffering
Filing authority depends on the family structure Requires proper estate authority

These claims can overlap, but they are legally distinct. A qualified lawyer for wrongful death should identify every available claim and ensure that it is brought by the proper person.

What Experience Should the Lawyer Have?

The lawyer should have substantial experience with fatal-injury cases that resemble the circumstances of your family’s loss.

General courtroom experience is useful, but it does not automatically establish experience with wrongful death litigation.

Ask how frequently the attorney handles fatal injury claims and whether those cases involve similar issues.

Relevant experience may include:

  • Investigating deaths involving commercial trucks
  • Reviewing medical records in fatal malpractice claims
  • Identifying multiple responsible companies
  • Working with medical, financial, safety, or accident-reconstruction experts
  • Calculating economic and intangible losses
  • Taking depositions and presenting evidence at trial
  • Coordinating wrongful death and estate claims

See how a Duluth, GA wrongful death lawyer can investigate negligence, preserve evidence, identify responsible parties, and pursue an eligible family’s claim.

Do not rely on the number of years a person has held a law license alone. Ask how those years relate to complex wrongful death investigations, negotiations, and trials.

Have Questions About Wrongful Death Attorney Fees?
Get clear answers about fees, expenses, and your legal options during a confidential consultation.
Call (404) 341-5314

How Can You Evaluate the Lawyer’s Results?

Evaluate prior results for relevance and context rather than assuming that the largest advertised number predicts what will happen in your case.

Past results can show whether a lawyer has handled serious disputes, worked with complicated evidence, or taken cases through trial.

However, every death, family structure, insurance policy, defendant, and evidentiary record is different.

When reviewing results, ask:

  • Was the matter a wrongful death case?
  • Were liability and causation disputed?
  • Did it involve facts similar to this case?
  • Was the outcome obtained through settlement, judgment, or jury verdict?
  • What challenges did the lawyer have to overcome?
  • Who at the firm performed the principal work?

Finch McCranie LLP states that it has handled serious personal injury and wrongful death matters since 1966 and has recovered more than $500 million in verdicts and settlements across its practices.

These figures provide background about the firm, but they are not guarantees of a future result.

The firm’s broader Atlanta wrongful death attorney page provides additional information about its experience and approach to wrongful death claims.

What Questions Should You Ask During a Consultation?

Ask questions that reveal who will handle the case, how the firm will investigate it, what it will cost, and how your family will receive updates.

A consultation should help both the family and the attorney decide whether the relationship is a suitable fit.

Use this checklist:

  • How many wrongful death cases have you handled?
  • Have you handled cases involving similar facts?
  • Who will have primary responsibility for my case?
  • Will I communicate directly with an attorney?
  • What evidence needs to be preserved immediately?
  • What weaknesses or uncertainties do you see?
  • Which experts may be needed?
  • How will damages be evaluated?
  • Do you prepare cases for trial?
  • How often will I receive updates?
  • How are attorney fees and case expenses handled?
  • What happens if the case does not produce a recovery?

Pay attention to the clarity of the answers. A trustworthy wrongful death attorney should explain legal concepts in understandable language and acknowledge when an answer depends on further investigation.

Does the Lawyer Have Sufficient Resources?

The law firm should have the personnel, time, expert relationships, technology, and financial capacity needed to develop a serious wrongful death case.

Fatal injury litigation can require extensive records, witness interviews, site inspections, electronic data, depositions, expert testimony, demonstrative evidence, and months or years of preparation.

A larger firm is not automatically better, and a smaller firm is not automatically more attentive. The useful question is whether the wrongful death law firm can give your case the resources it reasonably requires.

A typical case may progress through the following stages:

Initial review: The lawyer examines available records and identifies filing authority, potential defendants, and deadlines.

Evidence preservation: Letters and legal notices may be sent to prevent relevant documents, video, equipment, or electronic records from being destroyed.

Independent investigation: Attorneys gather records, interview witnesses, inspect physical evidence, and consult qualified experts.

Claim evaluation: The legal team analyzes liability, causation, insurance coverage, and the family’s economic and intangible losses.

Filing and discovery: If a lawsuit is filed, the parties exchange records, take depositions, and challenge each other’s evidence.

Negotiation or trial: The parties may negotiate at several points, but the lawyer should remain prepared to present the case in court.

For a more detailed explanation of these stages, review the firm’s wrongful death lawsuit timeline .

How Should the Lawyer Communicate With Your Family?

The lawyer should communicate clearly, respond within a reasonable time, explain important decisions, and treat grieving family members with patience and respect.

Communication is not merely a customer-service issue. Families may need to make decisions about evidence, settlement offers, estate administration, discovery, and trial. They need enough information to make those decisions thoughtfully.

Before hiring an attorney, ask:

  • Who will provide routine updates?
  • How quickly does the firm usually return calls?
  • Can updates be provided by telephone, email, or video meeting?
  • Will the lawyer explain major filings and settlement offers?
  • How will disagreements among family members be handled?
  • Who should the family contact when the primary lawyer is unavailable?

Finch McCranie LLP describes its approach as compassionate and team-oriented, with an emphasis on returning calls, communicating clearly, and treating clients as its lawyers would want to be treated.

How Much Does Representation Cost?

Many wrongful death attorneys use contingency fees, but families should obtain a written agreement explaining the percentage, litigation expenses, and what happens if no recovery is made.

Under a contingency arrangement, the attorney’s fee is calculated as an agreed percentage of the amount recovered. This does not necessarily mean that every expense is automatically waived.

Ask whether potential expenses include:

  • Medical-record charges
  • Court filing and service fees
  • Expert consultation and testimony
  • Deposition transcripts
  • Accident reconstruction or testing
  • Travel and evidence-storage costs
  • Trial exhibits and demonstrative materials

The State Bar of Georgia advises clients to request a written fee agreement and ask questions about terms they do not understand. Clear terms at the beginning can help prevent later disagreements.

Never choose an attorney based only on the lowest fee. Compare the proposed fee with the lawyer’s experience, workload, resources, responsibilities, and willingness to prepare the claim fully.

Have Questions About Wrongful Death Attorney Fees?
Get clear answers about fees, expenses, and your legal options during a confidential consultation.
Call (404) 341-5314

Why Does Local Knowledge Matter in Duluth?

Local knowledge can help a lawyer understand the courts, agencies, roads, medical providers, and practical procedures connected to a Duluth wrongful death case.

Duluth is in Gwinnett County and is part of the larger Atlanta metropolitan area. Depending on the facts and defendants, a lawsuit may be filed in Gwinnett County or another proper venue.

Local familiarity may help when obtaining records, locating witnesses, arranging inspections, or working with professionals in the area. However, an office address by itself does not prove that an attorney has the experience required for a complex case.

A family searching for an experienced wrongful death lawyer near me should consider both convenience and capability. The stronger choice is usually the attorney who combines accessible communication with relevant legal and trial experience.

Finch McCranie LLP maintains an office at 3160 Main Street, Suite 102, Duluth, GA 30096, as well as an Atlanta office.

What Warning Signs Should You Avoid?

Avoid lawyers who guarantee an outcome, pressure you to sign immediately, give unclear answers about fees, or cannot explain who will handle the case.

Myth vs. Fact

✗ Myth: The lawyer with the biggest advertisement must be the best choice.

✓ Fact: Advertising does not establish relevant case experience, resources, or client service.

✗ Myth: Every wrongful death case has a predictable settlement value.

✓ Fact: Value depends on liability, evidence, family circumstances, damages, insurance, and other case-specific factors.

✗ Myth: A civil claim cannot proceed without criminal charges.

✓ Fact: Civil and criminal proceedings serve different purposes and use different standards.

✗ Myth: Every claim must go to trial.

✓ Fact: Some cases settle, but careful trial preparation may strengthen the negotiating position.

✗ Myth: Families have plenty of time to select a lawyer.

✓ Fact: Legal deadlines and disappearing evidence can make delay harmful.

Additional warning signs include:

  • Refusing to provide a written fee agreement
  • Making promises before reviewing the records
  • Avoiding questions about trial experience
  • Passing every question to nonlawyer personnel
  • Providing no plan for preserving evidence
  • Pressuring the family to accept an early settlement
  • Failing to identify potential conflicts of interest

For more clarification, review Wrongful Death Claim Myths and Facts Every Family Should Know .

How Should You Compare Your Final Choices?

Compare each lawyer using consistent criteria rather than relying only on advertising, personality, or a single case result.

Selection Factor What to Look For
Wrongful death experience Regular experience handling fatal-injury claims
Similar case experience Familiarity with cases involving comparable facts and legal issues
Trial preparation Ability and willingness to prepare the case for court
Evidence preservation A clear plan for securing records, footage, physical evidence, and witness statements
Experts and resources Access to appropriate experts, investigators, personnel, and technology
Communication Clear answers, reasonable response times, and regular case updates
Fee transparency A written agreement explaining fees, expenses, and payment terms
Personal trust Respectful treatment and genuine attention to your family’s concerns

No single factor should determine your choice. Consider whether the attorney listened carefully, answered difficult questions honestly, and explained the potential strengths and challenges of your case.

A consultation should give you a clearer understanding of your legal options. If you feel rushed, confused, or pressured, consider consulting another wrongful death attorney before signing an agreement.

What Should Your Family Do Next?

Your family should preserve available information, prepare focused questions, and speak with a qualified attorney before evidence disappears or a filing deadline passes.

Collect the documents already available without delaying the consultation. These may include death certificates, incident reports, medical records, photographs, videos, insurance correspondence, witness information, employment records, and funeral bills.

A missing police report does not necessarily prevent an investigation. Other evidence may help establish what occurred, as explained in Can a Duluth Wrongful Death Attorney Help if There’s No Police Report?

Georgia wrongful death deadlines can involve important exceptions, tolling rules, and related estate issues.

The general two-year period should not be treated as permission to wait. A case-specific review is necessary.

Choosing a lawyer is ultimately about finding the right combination of experience, resources, communication, preparation, and trust. No attorney can guarantee a result, but the attorney should be able to describe a careful and evidence-based path forward.

Have Questions About Wrongful Death Attorney Fees?
Get clear answers about fees, expenses, and your legal options during a confidential consultation.
Call (404) 341-5314

FAQ’s

What Questions Should I Ask a Wrongful Death Lawyer Before Hiring Them?

Ask about the lawyer’s relevant experience, trial preparation, investigation process, expert resources, communication policy, fees, and case expenses. You should also ask what potential strengths and challenges the lawyer identifies based on the currently available information.

Why Should I Hire a Lawyer for a Wrongful Death Claim?

A lawyer for wrongful death can investigate the circumstances, determine who may file, identify potentially responsible parties, preserve evidence, and document eligible losses. The lawyer can also communicate with insurers, negotiate a resolution, and prepare the case for court when necessary.

How Much Does a Wrongful Death Attorney Charge in Georgia?

Many wrongful death attorneys work under contingency-fee agreements, meaning their fee is based on an agreed percentage of the recovery. Review the written agreement carefully to understand the percentage, responsibility for case expenses, and what happens if no compensation is recovered.

How Soon Should I Contact a Wrongful Death Lawyer in Duluth?

Contact a lawyer as soon as you suspect that negligence or wrongful conduct contributed to the death. Prompt action may help preserve surveillance footage, electronic information, physical evidence, records, and witness recollections before they become unavailable.

Can I Speak With More Than One Wrongful Death Law Firm?

Yes. Consulting more than one firm can help you compare experience, proposed strategies, communication styles, resources, and fee terms. However, avoid unnecessary delays because legal deadlines and the availability of important evidence may affect the claim.

Can a Wrongful Death Attorney Estimate the Value of My Claim Immediately?

An attorney usually cannot provide a reliable estimate before investigating liability, damages, insurance coverage, and the circumstances of the deceased person’s life. Be cautious of anyone who guarantees a particular settlement or result during the initial consultation.

Should I Choose a Local Wrongful Death Lawyer in Duluth?

A local office can make meetings more convenient and may provide familiarity with Gwinnett County procedures, but location should not be the only consideration. Choose an attorney who offers the appropriate combination of relevant experience, investigative resources, trial preparation, communication, and trust.

What Are the Challenges of Defending Against Wrongful Death Allegations?

Defending a wrongful death lawsuit can involve significant legal, financial, and emotional challenges. 

These cases often include complex evidence, disputed facts, expert testimony, and substantial compensation claims.

However, an allegation does not automatically establish legal responsibility. 

The defense can challenge whether the defendant owed a legal duty, whether their conduct caused the death, and whether the claimed damages are supported by evidence. 

The defense may also examine who contributed to the incident and whether the lawsuit meets applicable legal requirements.

The Legal Grounds Behind a Wrongful Death Claim

A wrongful death claim generally arises when a person’s death is allegedly caused by another party’s negligence, recklessness, or wrongful conduct. 

Defendants may include individuals, businesses, healthcare providers, employers, property owners, or manufacturers.

These claims can result from motor vehicle accidents, medical malpractice, workplace accidents, defective products, dangerous property conditions, construction incidents, or nursing home abuse. 

The defense may challenge whether the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, caused the death, or whether the survivors suffered legally compensable losses.

Establishing What Truly Caused the Death

Causation is often a key issue in wrongful death cases. 

An injury or incident does not automatically prove that the defendant’s conduct caused the death, especially when underlying medical conditions or multiple factors are involved.

The defense may review medical records, autopsy findings, accident reports, and expert opinions to determine the actual cause of death. 

If the evidence does not establish a clear connection between the defendant’s conduct and the fatal outcome, the defense may challenge the causation element of the claim.

Challenging Claims of Negligence

Many wrongful death lawsuits are based on allegations of negligence. 

The defense may challenge whether the defendant acted unreasonably under the circumstances.

For example, in a fatal traffic accident, the plaintiff may allege that a driver was speeding or distracted. 

The defense may present evidence showing that the driver followed traffic laws or that another factor caused the collision.

In a premises liability case, a property owner may argue that they did not know about the dangerous condition or that the condition was not reasonably foreseeable.

Similarly, an employer accused of causing a workplace death may contend that appropriate safety procedures were in place and that the incident resulted from an unforeseeable event.

The defense may rely on witness testimony, photographs, surveillance footage, company policies, inspection records, and other documentation to challenge allegations of negligence.

Examining the Deceased Person’s Role in the Incident

In certain cases, the defense may argue that the deceased person’s own actions contributed to the accident or injuries.

For example, evidence may indicate that the deceased was speeding, failed to follow safety instructions, ignored warnings, or engaged in conduct that contributed to the incident.

Whether this argument affects the outcome depends on the jurisdiction. 

Some states follow comparative negligence rules, which may reduce compensation based on the percentage of fault assigned to the deceased. Other jurisdictions apply different standards that can have a greater impact on recovery.

The defense must therefore examine the deceased person’s actions carefully and determine whether there is credible evidence showing that those actions contributed to the fatal event.

This type of defense can be particularly sensitive because it involves discussing the conduct of someone who is no longer able to explain their actions. 

For that reason, the argument should be based on reliable evidence rather than assumptions.

Dealing With Complex Medical Causation

Medical malpractice wrongful death cases can be difficult because patients may have complex medical histories and multiple health conditions. 

The defense may argue that the provider followed the appropriate standard of care or that the underlying condition caused the death.

Medical experts may review records, test results, and treatment decisions to determine whether an alleged error directly caused the fatal outcome. 

Ultimately, proving that a medical mistake occurred is not enough; the plaintiff must also show that the mistake caused the death.

Sorting Through Conflicting Evidence

Wrongful death cases often involve evidence from multiple sources, which may sometimes conflict.

 Witness statements, police reports, medical records, and other documents may provide different accounts of what happened.

The defense must carefully assess the reliability of evidence such as accident reports, medical and autopsy records, photographs, security footage, vehicle data, and safety documents. 

While conflicting evidence does not automatically defeat a claim, inconsistencies may raise questions about what happened and whether the plaintiff can prove the required elements of the case.

Responding to Expert Witnesses

Expert witnesses often play an important role in complex wrongful death cases. 

They may provide opinions on medicine, accident reconstruction, workplace safety, product defects, or financial losses.

The defense may challenge an expert’s qualifications, methods, assumptions, or conclusions and present its own experts with alternative explanations. 

Carefully evaluating expert testimony and supporting evidence can be critical to the defense strategy.

Contesting the Amount of Compensation Claimed

The defense may also challenge the amount of compensation sought by the plaintiff. 

Depending on applicable law, claims may include medical and funeral expenses, lost income, financial support, household services, companionship, and emotional distress.

The defense may question whether these losses are supported by evidence or whether calculations are reasonable. Future financial losses and non-economic damages can be especially difficult to measure, often leading to disputes over the actual value of the claimed losses.

Addressing Multiple Potentially Responsible Parties

Some wrongful death cases involve multiple potentially responsible parties, such as employers, contractors, property owners, manufacturers, or drivers. 

The defense may investigate whether another party caused or contributed to the death.

Depending on applicable law, liability may be divided among multiple parties. 

Identifying all relevant parties can affect defense strategy, insurance coverage, settlement negotiations, and the allocation of liability.

Dealing With the Emotional Weight of the Case

Wrongful death cases are highly sensitive because of the profound impact on surviving family members. 

Defendants must present legal arguments carefully, especially when challenging the family’s claims or discussing the deceased person’s conduct.

The defense should focus on relevant evidence and applicable law rather than personal attacks. 

Respectful communication can help present legitimate legal arguments while protecting the defendant’s interests.

Raising Procedural and Legal Defenses

A wrongful death defense may involve procedural and legal issues unrelated to the underlying facts. 

The defense may question whether the plaintiff has the legal right to file the claim, whether it was filed on time, or whether required notices were properly provided.

Other issues may include naming the correct defendant and establishing the required elements of the claim.

 These issues can affect whether the case proceeds and often require careful review of applicable laws and court rules.

Preserving Evidence Before It Disappears

Early investigation is crucial in wrongful death cases because evidence can become harder to obtain over time. Witnesses may forget details, surveillance footage may be deleted, and physical conditions may change.

The defense may need to quickly preserve records, inspect the scene, review electronic data, interview witnesses, and consult experts. 

A prompt investigation can help uncover important facts and identify weaknesses in the allegations.

Settlement Negotiations and Trial Preparation

Not every wrongful death case goes to trial. Some are resolved through settlement, which can help avoid the time, expense, uncertainty, and emotional strain of prolonged litigation.

The defense must evaluate whether settlement is appropriate based on the evidence and potential liability.

If negotiations fail, the defense should be prepared to present evidence, question witnesses, challenge experts, and argue that the plaintiff has not proven the claim. 

Trial preparation can also strengthen settlement negotiations by clarifying the risks for both sides.

How a Defense Attorney Can Help

Wrongful death cases involve complex legal and factual issues. 

A defense attorney can investigate the allegations, evaluate evidence, and determine applicable defenses.

Depending on the case, an attorney may review the complaint, preserve evidence, interview witnesses, consult experts, challenge causation, dispute damages, identify other responsible parties, negotiate settlements, and prepare for trial. 

The defense strategy should be based on credible evidence and the specific facts of the case.

Final Thoughts

Defending a wrongful death claim can be challenging due to complex legal, emotional, and financial issues. 

The defense may need to challenge negligence and causation, respond to expert testimony, dispute damages, and address procedural requirements.

A strong defense begins with a thorough investigation, evidence preservation, and identification of all potentially responsible parties. 

If you or your organization faces a wrongful death claim, seeking legal guidance promptly can help protect your interests and determine the appropriate defense strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most common defense in a wrongful death case?

Common defenses may include disputing negligence, challenging causation, arguing that another party was responsible, or presenting evidence that the deceased person’s own actions contributed to the incident. The appropriate defense depends on the specific facts and applicable law.

Can a defendant argue that they did not cause the death?

Yes. Causation is often a central issue in wrongful death litigation. A defendant may present evidence showing that another event, medical condition, or party caused the death or that the alleged conduct was not the legal cause of the fatal outcome.

Can the deceased person be considered partly responsible?

In some jurisdictions, the defense may argue that the deceased contributed to the accident or injuries. Depending on the applicable negligence rules, this may reduce the compensation available to surviving family members or affect the claim in other ways.

How can a defendant challenge a wrongful death claim based on medical malpractice?

The defense may argue that the healthcare provider met the required standard of care or that the alleged error did not cause the death. Medical expert testimony is often important when evaluating these arguments.

What happens when several parties may be responsible?

The defense may investigate the conduct of other individuals or organizations that may have contributed to the death. Depending on applicable law, liability may be divided among multiple parties.

Hire Wrongful Death Lawyers After an Apartment Complex Shooting

A fatal shooting at an apartment complex can leave families facing not only the emotional impact of a sudden loss but also difficult questions about whether the tragedy could have been prevented.

Although the individual responsible for the shooting may face criminal prosecution, an apartment owner or property manager may also bear civil liability if inadequate security measures contributed to a foreseeable risk of violent crime. 

In Georgia, a wrongful death claim may allow eligible family members to seek compensation when negligent security or other breaches of a property owner’s duty of care are shown to have played a role in the death. 

Understanding how these claims work can help families evaluate their legal options after an apartment complex shooting. 

Why Legal Guidance Can Be Important After an Apartment Complex Shooting

The aftermath of a fatal apartment complex shooting can be overwhelming for surviving family members. 

Along with coping with the loss of a loved one, families may face questions about ongoing investigations, insurance communications, and whether anyone other than the shooter may bear legal responsibility.

Because criminal and civil proceedings serve different purposes, the outcome of a criminal case does not necessarily determine whether a wrongful death claim is available.

An attorney can explain how Georgia wrongful death law applies to the family’s circumstances, identify who may have the legal right to file a claim, and help ensure important deadlines are not overlooked. 

Early legal guidance can also help families understand the legal process, evaluate potential claims, and make informed decisions based on the specific facts of the case rather than assumptions or incomplete information.

Can an Apartment Shooting Lead to a Wrongful Death Claim?

Yes, a fatal apartment shooting may lead to a wrongful death claim under Georgia law if another party’s negligence contributed to the circumstances surrounding the death. 

Although the shooter may face criminal prosecution, a separate civil claim may be available if an apartment owner, property manager, security company, or another responsible party failed to exercise reasonable care in maintaining a reasonably safe property.

Not every apartment shooting gives rise to a wrongful death lawsuit. 

Whether a claim exists depends on the facts of the case, including the property’s conditions, the actions of those responsible for managing it, and whether there is evidence of negligence that may have contributed to the incident. 

Because these cases are highly fact-specific, talking to one of the best wrongful death lawyers can help families understand their legal rights, determine whether a claim may be available, and evaluate the options provided under Georgia law.

How Does a Wrongful Death Claim Work?

A wrongful death claim is a civil lawsuit that allows certain surviving family members, or in some cases the deceased person’s estate, to seek compensation when a person’s death is caused by another party’s negligent or wrongful conduct. 

Unlike a criminal case, which is brought by the government to determine criminal liability, a wrongful death claim focuses on whether another party can be held financially responsible for the losses resulting from the death.

The process typically begins with evaluating the circumstances of the incident to determine whether a valid legal claim exists. 

If appropriate, the claim is filed against the party or parties alleged to have contributed to the death. 

During the case, both sides may exchange evidence, interview witnesses, and present expert opinions before attempting to resolve the matter through settlement or, if necessary, litigation. 

Because Georgia law governs who may file a wrongful death claim and establishes specific procedural requirements and deadlines, consulting a wrongful death lawyer can help families understand how the process applies to their particular situation.

When Can an Apartment Complex Be Liable?

An apartment complex is not automatically responsible whenever a fatal shooting occurs on its property. 

Liability depends on whether the owner, management company, or another responsible party failed to meet its legal duty to maintain reasonably safe premises under the circumstances. 

In Georgia, this often requires showing that the property owner knew or should have known about a safety risk and failed to take reasonable steps to address it.

Whether an apartment complex may be held liable depends on the specific facts of the case. 

Factors such as the property’s security measures, maintenance of access points, prior safety concerns, and the circumstances surrounding the shooting may all be considered. 

These cases frequently involve complex legal and factual issues, determining liability usually requires a careful review of the available evidence and applicable Georgia law.

Why Hiring a Wrongful Death Lawyer Matters

Wrongful death claims arising from apartment complex shootings often involve multiple parties, extensive records, and disputed questions of liability. 

Property owners, management companies, security contractors, and insurers may each have different positions regarding responsibility. 

An experienced wrongful death lawyer can evaluate the facts, identify potentially liable parties, explain how Georgia law applies to the case, and guide families through each stage of the legal process.

Legal representation can also help ensure that important records are obtained, filing deadlines are met, and communications with insurers and opposing parties are handled appropriately. 

While no attorney can guarantee the outcome of a case, timely legal guidance can help families understand their rights and make informed decisions based on the available evidence.

What Compensation May Be Available in an Apartment Shooting Wrongful Death Claim?

A wrongful death claim may provide compensation for the financial and personal losses resulting from the death of a loved one. 

The amount and type of compensation available depend on the circumstances of the case and the damages recognized under applicable law. 

As every claim is unique, compensation is determined on an individual basis rather than through a fixed formula.

Depending on the facts, eligible family members may seek compensation for the full value of the deceased person’s life, as well as funeral and burial expenses, medical costs incurred before death, and the loss of financial support or services the deceased would have provided.

In certain situations, the deceased person’s estate may also pursue separate claims for damages arising before death, such as medical expenses and conscious pain and suffering, when supported by the circumstances.

A wrongful death lawyer can explain the categories of damages that may apply, answer questions about the claims process, and help families understand the compensation that may be available based on their particular situation.

Conclusion

Every apartment shooting case presents its own legal and factual challenges. 

A thorough evaluation of the circumstances can help determine the appropriate course of action and whether a civil claim may be available. 

Seeking timely legal advice allows families to better understand their options moving forward. 

Compassionate Legal Support When You Need It Most 

Losing a loved one in an apartment complex shooting is a devastating experience, and families are often left with unanswered questions about what happened and whether someone else may share legal responsibility. 

During this difficult time, understanding your rights and the legal process can feel overwhelming.

Finch McCranie LLP provides compassionate legal guidance to families seeking answers after a fatal apartment complex shooting. 

Our firm can access the circumstances of the incident, identify potentially responsible parties, explain the claims process, and help protect your family’s interests throughout the case.

If you have lost a loved one in an apartment complex shooting, you can consult with a wrongful death lawyer to know your legal options and make informed decisions about the next steps. 

For more information, schedule a consultation and discuss your situation with an experienced attorney.

FAQs

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Claim After an Apartment Complex Shooting?

The right to file a wrongful death claim depends on the relationship between the deceased and the surviving family members. Because eligibility is determined by state law and individual circumstances, it is important to obtain legal guidance before taking action.

Can an Apartment Complex Be Held Responsible for a Fatal Shooting?

An apartment complex may be legally responsible if its actions or failures contributed to conditions that increased the risk of a fatal shooting. Whether liability exists depends on the specific facts and the responsibilities of those involved in managing the property.

Can a Civil Wrongful Death Claim Proceed if There Is a Criminal Case?

Yes, a wrongful death claim is a civil matter that is independent of any criminal prosecution. Families may have the option to pursue a civil claim even while a criminal investigation or court proceeding is ongoing.

What Documents May Be Helpful When Discussing a Wrongful Death Case?

Any information related to the incident may be useful, including police reports, medical records, photographs, insurance correspondence, witness information, or other available documents. If certain records are unavailable, an attorney can advise on how they may be obtained.

Can More Than One Party Be Named in a Wrongful Death Lawsuit?

Depending on the circumstances, a wrongful death claim may involve multiple defendants if more than one person or entity is alleged to have contributed to the events leading to the death. The parties involved vary based on the facts of each case. A wrongful death attorney can review the available information, identify potentially responsible parties, and explain whether claims may be brought against one or multiple defendants. 

How to Know If You Have a Medical Malpractice Case

Medical treatment does not always lead to the outcome a patient expects.

Some treatments are unsuccessful even when doctors follow the proper standard of care.

However, there are situations where a medical provider makes a preventable mistake that causes serious harm.

When that happens, the patient may have grounds for a medical malpractice claim.

Many people are unsure whether what happened to them qualifies as medical malpractice.

They may know something went wrong, but they are not sure if the mistake was avoidable or if the provider can be held legally responsible.

(more…)

How Much Can You Recover in a Wrongful Death Lawsuit?

Wrongful death lawsuit compensation in Georgia is based on the full value of the life of the person who passed away due to another party’s negligence. 

When a family loses a loved one in a preventable accident, the emotional loss is overwhelming. 

At the same time, financial pressures often intensify due to lost income, medical bills, and funeral expenses.

Georgia law allows certain family members to pursue compensation for death by negligence. The amount recovered depends on multiple legal, financial, and factual factors. 

(more…)

Navigating Truck Accident Lawsuits: Product Liability & Medical Malpractice

In the realm of personal injury law, few incidents carry the potential for devastation, quite like truck accidents. These collisions often result in severe injuries, significant property damage, and, tragically, loss of life. When such accidents occur, victims and their families are thrust into a complex legal landscape where multiple factors may contribute to the incident’s cause and subsequent liability.

Understanding Truck Accident Lawsuits

Truck accident lawsuits are legal proceedings initiated by individuals who have suffered harm due to a collision involving a commercial truck. These lawsuits seek to hold responsible parties accountable for their negligence or misconduct, with the ultimate goal of securing compensation for the victim’s damages.

(more…)

Top 10 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Truck Accident Lawyer

In the aftermath of a truck accident, navigating legal proceedings can be overwhelming. From mounting medical bills to complex insurance claims, victims often find themselves in need of legal assistance. Choosing the right truck accident lawyer is crucial to ensuring fair compensation and navigating the complexities of the legal system. To aid in this process, here are the top 10 questions to ask before hiring a truck accident lawyer.

10 questions to ask before hiring a truck accident lawyer

(more…)

Register for 2024 “Whistleblower Law Symposium”–Live Event (Virtually) on March 13

For many years, Michael Sullivan of our firm and his colleague Jim Breen have organized the “Whistleblower Law Symposium.” It has consistently received high marks from participants. 

This year’s Symposium will be available either in-person or online on Wednesday, March 13, starting at 815 am EDT.  It offers 7.5 CLE hours, including 1 Ethics hour and 4 Trial Practice hours. Cost is $279.  

You can register (and see the full Agenda) here: atlantabar.org/….   Topics include: 

(more…)

The Silent Battle: How to Win Your Medical Negligence Lawsuit

Medical negligence lawsuits can be daunting, but understanding the intricacies of the legal process is crucial for success. 

In this guide, we’ll navigate the silent battle of medical negligence lawsuits, shedding light on critical aspects, strategies, and tips to help you emerge victorious.

Understanding Medical Negligence

Medical negligence occurs when a healthcare professional deviates from the standard of care, harming the patient. 

It’s essential to recognize the signs and understand that not all medical complications result from negligence.

(more…)

Hiring the Right Advocate: A Guide to Medical Negligence Attorneys in Atlanta

Pursuing justice in medical negligence cases in Atlanta requires a skilled legal ally. 

Finding the right attorney is crucial when you or a loved one has experienced harm due to medical malpractice. 

A Medical Negligence Attorney in Atlanta can be the key to navigating the complex legal terrain and securing the compensation you deserve.

Understanding Medical Negligence

Medical negligence, also known as medical malpractice, occurs when a healthcare professional fails to provide the standard of care expected in their field, harming the patient. 

(more…)